Navy Coup Attempted Against Trump?

Thanks Vlad, I owe you one!

Ruslan Maratovich Asainov

President Putin coordinated with President Trump, transferring into FBI custody ISIS sniper and weapons instructor Ruslan Maratovich Asainov [a naturalized US citizen] who revealed to his Russian Police interrogators that he had worked with US NAVY SEALS in Iraq, who were to be smuggled into the US for their intended assassination attempt: the target being President Trump.

SecDef Mark Esper

Secretary of Defense Esper suspended from duty, and ordered back from Iraq, 19 USN SEALs and four of their support troops.  Esper also ordered the immediate arrest of 16 Marines in California.

The cover story for the removal of the SEALs was
"Foxtrot Platoon, Seal Team 7, drank alcohol at a 4th of July Party and a senior enlisted member had raped a female Service member attached to the platoon."

Esper also ordered the immediate arrest of 16 Marines in California.

Asainov had worked his way up through the ranks to achieve the position of Emir. In correspondence to friends in Brooklyn, he stated he would like to "... die on the battlefield."
[We're not sure how he had connected with the US SEALs]

The question becomes, how deeply imbedded are such Military traitors in our system, and how many more potential of them are there in the Navy and the other Services.

And, how many terrorists like Asainov reside in our midst.

Interestingly, only days before, Esper had been a place holder Secretary of the Army.

 His immediate appointment as Secretary of Defense took place without debate, and was approved by the Senate with an unprecedented 90-8 vote. Esper is a West Point classmate of Secretary of State Pompeo.

Is it possible key Congressional leaders were briefed on the probability of a Military Coup in progress, giving them a sense of urgency?

Admiral Gorshkov Stealth Frigate

A sidelight of this event was that President Putin informed President Trump of this impending coup by the US Navy, and positioned a Russian warship off the US coast.

[We suspect Putin trusts Trump to keep the Deep State warmongers in check and Trump as an ally in case the PRC poses a military threat.]

[The enemy of my enemy is my ally]


Putin thus stationed the Russian Admiral Gorshkov Class Stealth Frigate off the US Caribbean coastline, apparently anticipating a possible post-coup military attack on Russia. Previously, the frigate had been reported in Cuban waters.

[This class Stealth Frigate can fire cruise missiles, surface to air missiles, and even the GrahMos [PJ-10] supersonic sea-skimming cruise missile.]

ADM Moran

Esper then relieved Admiral William Moran who had been scheduled to become the Chief of Naval Operations [CNO] - citing an "unprofessional relationship with a subordinate."

Moran's nomination as CNO was unusual since his only Line Officer duty appeared to be his time as a P-3 Orion pilot.

 Oddly, his career seemed to be primarily as a Personnel Officer, rising to become the Chief of Naval Personnel -- an important position, but certainly not a normal stepping stone to the CNO position.

[But, interestingly, he was also the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations.]

Earlier, his assignments were in dual roles as well as Personnel Officer and either Executive Assistant or Deputy Commander. To the cynical eye, it would appear he was being groomed as the future, if qualified on paper only, the Navy CNO, but by whom?  A Deep State or Obama selectee?

On the other hand, if he were involved in coup planning [which we are not alleging], in managing flag officer selections, he could screen, pick and choose his future admiral rank junta.  

[Or, could he have been linked to the outing of and assassination of the Pentagon officers who attempted a meeting with 0bama at the Navy Yard to encourage him to resign in 2013? ]

Other reports indicate there may be linkage between the US Navy and Epstein's island[s], although the details of that arrangement are, as yet, not fully known. Perhaps Admiral Moran could elucidate for us.

Former DNI Dan Coats

Meanwhile, looking at Trump's machinations, this highly unusual sequence coincided with Trump's replacement of Dan Coats with Congressman John Ratcliffe. Officially, Coats had been quarreling with Trump over the "Russian Threat".

Coats' tacit alliance with Clapper and Brennan likely did not endear him to Trump, and Coats had been a K-Street lobbyist and was commonly regarded as a denizen of the Deep State, and not to be trusted.
 Better to "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer!"


Quite telling was the almost universal outrage by Democrats over Coats' departure. 

[The only time such outrage occurs is if Trump ditches a Democrat favorite. Hmm. ]

Why put Coats in such a sensitive Intelligence position? 
[Pure speculation on our part] 

1) Trump regarded the entire Intelligence Community as more of an adversary than a supporting organization, and the National Intelligence Estimates he received were of little value. So, keeping Coats in that position neutered his power, and kept him in a place where Trump could monitor him. 

2) The monitoring part was important since Coats was presumed to be an adversary, a leaker, and tied to Clapper, Brennan, and Obama supporters. Monitoring Coats revealed all his contacts, and identified more of the hidden adversaries, particularly Deep State orchestrators. 

3) Last, but not least, was the overlap between the Deep State and the Epstein cabal. 

Editorial Note

Was/is the Navy involved with Epstein, and if so, how, and beginning when. There have been a number of allusions to this relationship, and we suspect the smoke there may indicate a bit of fire. 

If, in fact, there were a coup afoot, we suspect there will be more attempts, and we'll see more luminaries disappearing from the landscape, only to reappear in Gitmo.

CIA Interrogations - Enhanced, or Torture

Enhanced Interrogation:  AKA - TORTURE

We've noted the circulation of what purports to be a CIA public service announcement regarding the value of "Enhanced Interrogation" of "Terrorist Prisoners" which allegedly produced extraordinary and actionable Intelligence.
[We've attached an extract of this report at the bottom of this blog post.]

Much of the published information is true, but it was definitely not produced from enhanced interrogation, but rather via different sourcing, much of it from unclassified, open-source newspaper accounts.  So, you may discount the origin of the data.

We are very familiar with all forms of interrogation and have conducted hundreds of interrogations, both tactical and strategic in war zones and  special facilities, as well as CounterIntelligence interrogations to determine espionage threats..  

We never had a prisoner who couldn't be broken -- and turned, to include NVA Political Officers and hardened guerrilla fighters.  And they were tougher than Taliban. At no time did we ever have to use other than normal interrogation techniques, and at no time, did we ever have to use torture to obtain results.  Essentially, torture routinely gives false results and misleading information -- and bad intelligence.

Successful interrogations come from sophisticated conversations, rather than beating information out of a prisoner.  Most prisoners willingly provide as much information as is requested or demanded, and a professional interrogator is prepared with background and confirmed data to determine how truthful the subject is.  

Essentially, there are three forms of interrogation:

1)  Simple debriefing is for prisoners who have no resistance training.  They'll be happy to chatter away and disclose everything they know, and often, information they were unaware they have/had.  Handled properly, they can be enormously helpful.  In one case, a teenager, illiterate and fairly simple, provided the location of the master logistics center for the Spring Offensive - allowing us to capture it, and essentially ending that war, at least for a while.

2)  Professional interrogations, which require the interrogator to be  trained in psychology and who looks for nuances in the subject's eyes, facial movements, body moisture, voice rhythms, etc., to determine attempts to mislead the interrogator.  The interrogator begins with a number of folders on his/her desk, and accepts the prisoner who, through psychological manipulation, assumes and fears torture.  The folders contain parameters of verified information to answer key questions which can lead to new questions and sophisticated [though non-violent] techniques.  For the most part, the subject is unaware of the true objectives of the interrogation.

3)  Hostile interrogations are used to break down the  subject through disorientation, fear of the unknown, various forms of psychological techniques, and special manipulation techniques, augmented by input from HUMINT, IMINT, SIGINT, COMINT, ELINT, etc.  

Again, opening folders with information the subject believes was provided by other prisoners weakens his/her resistance.   Add in fear of being caught lying, and the fear of the unknown becomes far more effective than actual torture.  

[See Room 101 in the Orwell's book, 1984].  This process requires a great deal of sophistication and education on the part of the Interrogator, but, again, includes absolutely NO TORTURE.]

FITD [Forscom Intelligence Training Detachment] - the unit we formed at Ft Bragg [1976] trained all USFORSCOM [Forces Command] tactical units and strategic Reserve units in proper interrogation methods; we created SOPs and manuals, most of which were incorporated years later in TRADOC [Training & Doctrine Command]. 

FITD was later converted to the 111th MI Brigade which took over the mission.

[Notably, Enhanced Interrogation techniques were legalized, and added to the Army's Field Manual, though still regarded as extreme, and unnecessary for the most part]

Unfortunately, as we learned from many years of association with, and assignments to the CIA, their approach to interrogations was unique.  

Since they lacked professional interrogators, they would draw on the Military for both SpecOps and mundane things like interrogations.  Unfortunately, the CIA would secretly coordinate with the Pentagon for untrained Warm Bodies to conduct these ops, and they would frequently end up with unskilled Marines or Army Infantry troops unskilled in interrogation, but who learned their trade by watching TV programs like Jack Bauer's skill sets in 24, in which torture was routinely used -- with very poor results.  Although the Military had trained, linguistically skilled professional interrogators, the CIA would ignore them and frequently depend on local nationals who had knowledge of either psychology or interrogation skills.

The greatest issue we have with the CIA's "enhanced interrogation" technique is that other countries [hostile and friendly] follow our lead.  If the US does it, it must be OK.  Worse, our adversaries/enemies look at us as the penultimate bad guys reflected in their propaganda themes, and use those techniques when interrogating US soldiers.  We were briefly captive of the Pathet Lao in southern Laos near the end of the war and were not amused by these techniques, which included fairly crude attempts at torture, before we found a way to exit the situation.  Later, we were interrogating an NVA captain at one point and asked him why the NVA treated our soldiers so viciously when they were captured.  He was astonished at the question and admonished me, saying, 

"We simply imitate your atrocities. Why, your troops mutilate our troops!  Your newspaper - Stars & Stripes herald such actions of one of your colonels."

Hatchet Hank Emerson

We were astonished, but placed a secure call to Saigon to a trusted friend at MACSOG who verified the torture and mutilation, and even shipped a copy of the Stars & Stripes which headlined this local hero, Lt Col Henry Emerson, thus affirming that we were, in fact, bad guys, leading to the torture of our own soldiers.  Such incidents continue today where we have fought.

We have enough enemies around the world now; we don't need more but we create enemies with the concept of torture.

In short, we do not support "enhanced" interrogation, a technique of negative value falsely touted by the CIA as a productive tool. We guarantee Enhanced Interrogation techniques will be/has been used against US PWs as a retaliatory measure.  

Ultimately, we are not labeling the US as the BAD GUY; but, we very much wish to see the CIA removed from such operations, particularly from controlling our Special Operations forces and Military Intelligence operations -- the actual trained Professionals in Military Operations and Human Intelligence programs!  

Below is an extract of the CIA's claim to intelligence production gained through, and which they claim justifies "Enhanced Interrogation".  

Keep in mind that virtually all of this information was 

published in the US News Media or on the Internet.

Hillary Dropping Out?

Will Hillary's Seizures affect voter confidence?

Here's an interesting rumor [unconfirmed, as yet].

Problem #1:  

Hillary had what appeared to be a seizure [video attached] during a photo op on 21 July 2016.  She quickly recovered, passing it off as a "brain freeze" from her drink, while her staff said she was just making fun of people with seizures.

Noteworthy is the concern of foreign government intelligence analysts who scrutinize every word, every movement, every health indicator of world leadership candidates to interpret their health, and particularly their mental health.  In this case, Hillary's mental health falls into question, creating a serious breach of confidence in her possible role as a world leader.  

-- Will she be capable of handling that 3:00 am call if she's in the midst of a seizure?  

-- Will she make a rational decision with her thumb on the nuclear missile launch button?

-- Will she be able to talk on the Red Phone if she's stumbling around the Lincoln Bedroom?

Is she mentally stable?
Ask the Secret Service.

Problem #2:

Apparently all the "polls" the DNC has been publishing about how overwhelmingly popular Hillary is doing with potential voters of either Party have been as bogus as we've presumed.

Turn-out for Hillary event;
one busload works if you crop the image

As we've observed, we've seen very few wide angle shots, either still or video, of Hillary's campaign events.  

Each image or video has been closely cropped to show a bunch of people [rarely more than 20] jammed together behind her -- with many appearing to be completely bored [perhaps because their pay for attending is so little].

Astute reporters who have attended the airport rallies have noted that the only crowds awaiting Hillary's plane consisted of airport crews on-hand to service her plane, plus a limousine waiting to take her to meet with donors.  Other than that, the airfields have been empty  of "supporters".

Speculation has been that the voting stations through which she was awarded the number of delegates required for her nomination were equipped with Soros voting machines, which oddly, awarded Bernie a paucity of votes, with overwhelming numbers for Hillary.  

The bewildering aspect of that voting was that exit polls reflected overwhelming support for Bernie.  

Could those machines have been rigged?

Well, by golly; it appears there was more than just rigging going on, and the Wicked Witch of the South, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was outed on 23 July 2016 in the Wikileaks dump of damning emails.  Now, Debbie is under fire, by Bernie and many others, to resign; it couldn't happen to a more appropriate person.

Now, as for rigging, we've seen it at its best in northern Virginia where voting sites had two machines, one for GOP and one for Democrat voters.  Strangely, the GOP machine at many sites was not functional, so all GOP registered voters had to vote using the Democrat-designated machine, which had only circles for two candidates:  Hillary or Bernie.  Since all GOP ballots were read dead-center, only the two of the five GOP candidates whose names appeared in the center of the ballot received votes.

A poll watcher at one location advised that a Spanish speaker caught a "volunteer interpreter" handing out Democrat ballots, instructing Latin voters that they "... have to use this [Democrat] ballot, and vote for either one."  They were not offered the GOP ballot, even when they requested one.  [The other poll workers had the "interpreter" removed, and filed charges against her, but we have to assume this practice was not unusual in the Primary.]

But, now we come to an interesting juncture in the election process.

The DNC has been gauging how Hillary can fare in this election, and their estimates are pretty grim, particularly in light of Wikileaks publication of a massive number of Hillary emails [which were intercepted most likely by Russian/Chinese/Mexican/Serbian/German/British/French/Swaziland Intelligence services.

It appears they fear Hillary is easily the most hated and distrusted candidate in the 21st Century, and that her chances of winning the election -- until two days ago -- were moderate to slim.  

But then, there appears to have been an Act of God.  

In the midst of an interview, Hillary appears to have had an epileptic fit during which her eyes glazed over, her head twisted and bounced, and she looked a bit crazy, causing political observers to presume that this medical malady was not one we'd like to see in a President who had her finger on the Nuclear Missile Button.
[Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC Delegate) moves in from behind to perform damage control and get Hillary back into human form before the alien insider her becomes visible]

Rest assured that our potential adversaries, the Chinese and the Russians, ISIS, Mexico, and Swaziland, along with our current allies [we can't think of any nation we can still call an ally at this point though] would interpret this medical incident as a positive.  

They all like to know that the US President, who is capable of initiating World War 3, is of sound mind and body.

Some may recall Hillary's "covert action" a while back where she commandeered a Military Attache aircraft and directed it to fly her to a remote spot in Iran for a covert meeting with Iran's leader -- the purpose being for her to proclaim that she had reached a secret agreement favorable to the US, and on which she could later claim success and run for President.  

Unfortunately, the plane was shot down, with the entire crew killed or captured, to include a Navy SEAL officer  [Commander Price] escorting her [he was later listed as having committed suicide in Afghanistan].

No one is sure who shot her plane down; the Israelis or the Iranian opposition; in any event, she somehow ended up in an Israeli hospital while the State Department/News Media announced she had the flu, had fallen, and had a concussion.



Interestingly, the Israelis nursed her to health and shipped her back to New York where she was transferred to a local hospital to ".. treat her flu and concussion."

But, we digress.

The DNC conundrum now is that Hillary is damaged goods.  [And Wasserman is destroyed.]

Valerie Jarrett is rumored to be staging Hillary's withdrawal based on "health issues" and may even openly refer to "epilepsy" -- without mentioning the head injuries Hillary suffered in the plane wreckage.  

Shotgun Joe

The template here is that Hillary will gracefully withdraw as a "fallen warrior", exit Stage Left to pre-recorded cheers and adulation, after which the DNC will announce that Joe Biden will graciously accept the nomination in Hillary's place.

That, of course, has been the fall-back position for the DNC from the beginning of this campaign, since Joe can be counted on to do what he is told.  And the Trump campaign organization hasn't had time to gather the dirt on Joe the Clown.  But, make no mistake; Joe is no more stupid or incompetent than W was.  Both are bright, accomplished fellows, but both have operated under severe threats by The Establishment mechanism, which dictates policy to both Parties.


Nonetheless, the GOP would be ecstatic to have Biden as the DNC candidate it could quietly support him in order to keep Trump out of the Oval Office.  If the GOP can defeat Trump by quietly backing Biden, they can continue taking all the bribes and perks they can handle, and go back to the "same old, same old", the constituency be damned!
[Impossible! you say; well, for example, in the 2010 Nevada Senate election, the GOP actively campaigned for that Evil-Doer, Harry Reid, whom the GOP officially and publicly hated, but they nonetheless threw every resource available against Sharon Angle to reelect Harry.]

Of course, once in office, there's no telling what Joe might do; and he still carries a grudge against the Clintons for their sabotage and smear campaign against him in earlier campaigns.  

Why, Joe just might appoint an Attorney General capable of taking the FBI investigations and evidence and prosecuting both Hillary and Bill, and shipping them both off to prison for 25 years.

Stranger things have happened.

Could Joe win the election?

Possibly.

He'd be much harder to beat than Hillary.

Breitbart - Assassinated by CIA?

Follow @SpookdBlog

Breitbart: Murdered in Plain Sight: Witness Disappears

Editor's Note:

I am updating this post [Breitbart Assassinated by CIA?] again based on what appears to have been a Congressional Coup attempt to assassinate President Trump.  The primary Conspirators were reportedly Speaker Pelosi and Senator Wyden, but also included a number of other politicians from both Parties - representing the Deep State and The Swamp.  

The evidence was presented by a "lip-reader" who viewed and interpreted the comments of key Congressional luminaries, chatting casually about the plot to kill Trump using the same poison combination which was used to kill Breitbart [described in the original post about the murder of Breitbart - below] and Justice Scalia.

This film clip [https://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0a9qmc9ju4U] shows how the poisons can be delivered via a "hand-shake" as depicted in a TV series some years ago; the poisons in this coup attempt were the same as used to murder Breitbart (using a special "dart pistol"),  and also into Scalia's skin (during a massage)].

Here is the alleged transcript, which appears to be quite damning:

The Three Poison Handshake

• 
  
  
  
• 
  
• 
  
•      Barbara Lee: 
• “First the poison, then we're getting rid of Pence 
• and then once we do all that Obama will be happy
• to sit on the Supreme Court since he does it anyway.”
• 
  



• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
  Ron Wyden to Jeanne Shaheen: 
• 

“Our problem is this is a crime and so let's say
•  if she has poisoned him and we see him drop dead…
• 
  
• ... but by then, I mean, even Joe Biden said he was gonna have my back, quite honestly, so what's the worst that can happen if she poisons him?”
• 
  
  
  
  
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• Jeanne Shaheen to Ron Wyden: 
• “He knows, that's why she'll do three poisons…
• 
  
• we're simply just doing it for the people.”
• 
  
• 
  
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  

• 
  
  
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• Nancy Pelosi: 
• “I got the poison.” 
• [Mutters to herself.]

Comments to Pence:

"Right, we never wanted a 

coup d'etat on you."

[Was Pence complicit?]

• 
  
  

• 
  
•   Roger Williams: 
• 
  
• “Senator, watch what happens when Nancy shakes his hand. Pelosi, Pelosi shakes it.”

[A "solid Trump-Supporter? Maybe not.]

• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
  
• 
• 
  
• 
  
  

  • Enrique [Henry] Cuellar to John Hoeven
  • 
    
  • “Senator, after she shakes his hand, 
  • I bet you it contaminates his wife too."

-------------

This post was updated after new evidence was presented 

regarding the conspiracy involving the Intelligence Community 

and Clinton/Obama trying to undermine the Trump Presidency.

I'm re-publishing this blogpost in light of the mass of damning evidence against the Deep State functionaries Messrs Obama Clapper, Brennan, Comey, et al, over and above the horrendous history of Hillary's Clinticides.  I wish to enhance readers' memories of key historical issues.

While I was an Intelligence Community Executive, I always had my suspicions of wrongdoing [e.g., the Church and Pike Committee findings], but I was skeptical of the extent of CIA assassination attempts to rid the system of knowledgeable functionaries capable of testifying before one of these committees.  

[Notably, Bill Colby, former Director of CIA, was murdered (drowned) outside his Maryland home shortly after he called his wife regarding dinner arrangements.]

I was also skeptical of the accusations against Presidents' GHW Bush, Clinton, and W, although I was convinced from the outset that both Obama and Senator McCain had criminal intent.  

But then, I learned GHW Bush began his rise to eminence within the CIA, running narcotics operations out of Columbia in the 1960s, coordinating the JFK assassination, coordinating the Black Helicopter narcotics distribution during the Vietnam War,  and continuing his linkage with the Cartels from then and throughout his Presidency, connecting to Arkansas Governor-later President Clinton using US Air Force planes to transport narcotics into the US. 

And then there was W, now tied to the detonation of the Twin Towers, killing thousands for massive profit via the covert movement of stored gold and FED Bearer Bonds, and finally, Obama, of whose criminality and linkage to China of which we are being made aware, day by day.

Ultimately, it was the assassination of Justice Scalia while he was a guest of the Bush family at a hunting lodge in Texas; we couldn't imagine Bush would be involved, but, he was!  At that point, it became very clear that our country was in grave danger at the hands of what we would recognize as the Deep State, which owns the CIA.

To be clear, I've been the target of a number of such assassination attempts to include
1)  Felony Hit&Run [Perp got a $10,000 fine] by a CIA contractor 

     [arrested a few blocks from the CIA Domestic Operations HQ]
2)  An attempt to persuade a heart doctor to end my life during a Stress Test,
3)  Another attempt to persuade a heart surgeon to terminate my life during a Stent insertion
     [they kept this Indian doctor up all night threatening him (he arrived completely
    disheveled and advised me of his ordeal with his tormentors, saying he had told them 
    to go fuck themselves]
4) Aside from physical attacks, they have attempted to destroy my finances and family,
5) They bombarded my cell phone with text messages, in various languages, which 
     included extracts obtained from my restricted Military Health files and classified

    Personnel reports.
6) They have also killed some of my (retired) associates in the IC - all of heart stoppage;
     here's a partial sampling (all persons were previously very healthy):

     a) Julie Miller (DCS Regional Operations Manager): found dead on her small Indiana farm
     b) Tim Holden (former) Commander of SEAL-Team One: a Hit&Run while on his bicycle 
          in his neighborhood; the driver was fined $690.
     c) Carol Bird (Daughter of OSS officer; Researcher for my counter-terrorist software

          program):  found dead in her garage.
     d) Sedgwick Tourison (former Director of the POW/MIA office at the Pentagon)
     e) John Gresham, Tom Clancy's researcher, Spec Ops specialist - worked with Bill Colby.

     f)  Bill Colby, Former Director of CIA, murdered by forced drowning, provided Gresham 

          material for Clancy's "fictional" books.

-------------

Original Posts re: Breitbart murder below:

2020 Footnote:

I am posting this once again in response to Twitter queries on the use of vaccines as a means of injecting lingering poisons or nano-bots to trigger deadly responses to 5G electrical stimuli - not something of science fiction.  Note, the methods of assassination described above relate to science developed by 1970 - 50 years ago.  I presume deadly "science" has evolved since then.

In March, 2012, I wrote about Andrew Breitbart's mysterious death from "heart stoppage", abruptly before his planned release of videos of Mr Obama which would have been extremely damaging to his re-election campaign; reportedly, there was footage of Harvard attendee Mr Obama and Bill Ayers discussing/planning a US revolution.  I'm not sure what else was to be released -- but perhaps, Mr Obama's henchmen suspected the worst.  In the meantime, I've analyzed his death.

---------------------------

Breitbart died stepping up on a Los Angeles curb, described by eye-witness Christopher Lasseter, he "... fell like a sack of potatoes...his skin turned bright red".  There was thick white band around his forehead all the way around his hairline, bright red face, thick thick white band - made me make a double-take!"
Lasseter, along with his parents, soon thereafter disappeared, and, skilled private investigators advised they were not to be found.  Perhaps a search of the desert outside Las Vegas might turn up their remains.

There was considerable interest in the coroner's autopsy, since many were suspicious about Mr Breitbart's sudden death shortly before his release of damning evidence against Mr Obama consisting of videos revealing Obama's Hope&Change agenda consisted of Racial Warfare and Class Division.

But, the Media extracts of the Coroner's report noted that Mr Breitbart died of "natural causes", i.e., "heart stoppage", or in technical terms: cardiac arrest. 

Now, that might have put suspicious minds to rest, but, on the day the Coroner's preliminary report was released, the attending forensic technician, Michael Cormier, died suddenly after ingesting a massive amount of arsenic - not further explained.  That death was quickly brushed from the news media coverage, and Cormier was attacked by the Media as a "scruffy, bespectacled lab tech"
[but, he had 20 years of experience and was the principle assistant to the LA Coroner -- and was reportedly the person on whom the TV series Quincy was based].

Following Breitbart's death, a bland video of Obama was shown, and the strangely re-shuffled Breitbart executive suite, headed by film-maker Steve Bannon and COO Laurence Solov, claimed
-- that's all there is folks; nothing to see here; move along, move along --
and the Breitbart commentary has since become quite bland and un-exposé-worthy.

But then, spoilsport Breitbart.com Editor in Chief Joel Pollack advised the video shown was only one of a series Breitbart had planned to show.  Sadly, those seem to have long-since disappeared. 
The actual event aside, the story of Breitbart's death is far more damning.

It took some research, but, I finally secured a copy of the actual autopsy report, which contradicted the official statement that Breitbart died of a "heart attack"

Quincy would have figured it out [imdb]

From the Autopsy Report #2012-01471 [dtd 05/02/2012], 

page 4 

 [the report has since been scrubbed from the Internet as "malicious malware"; in its place is a simple one page PDF declaring the death was of natural causes: HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY WITH FOCAL CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROSIS: [generally, such patients are '65 years old, or older and in ill health]

"The aorta is elastic and of even caliber throughout with vessels distributed normally from it.  Both Abdominal and Thoracic aorta have minimal lipid streaking.  There is no tortuosity or widening of the thoracic segment.  The abdominal aorta has no atherosclerosis. There is no dilation of the lower abdominal segment.  No aneurism is present.  The major branches of the aorta show no abnormality."

In other words, Breitbart's heart and cardiovascular system was that of a healthy adult male -- with no evidence normally associated with a heart attack.

Oddly, Deputy Medical Examiner Juan Carrillo, MD, attributed death to ".. coronary atherosclerosis" -- which was ruled out earlier in the report.  He explained that there was a "60% narrowing of a major coronary vessel and 'heart failure' cells in the lungs."

How odd, that all organs and cardiovascular components were that of a healthy adult male, but

  the artery feeding the lungs was nearly shut down abruptly 

-- symptoms consistent with the cobra venum toxins used by the CIA -- as described by [then] Director Bill Colby.
Although Director Colby is now deceased [he died of "heart failure" after he "drowned" in his front yard] the CIA and its weaponry live on.

CIA's "heart stopping" technology dates back to the 1970's, presented as evidence at the 1975 Church Committee hearings.

Senator Goldwater examines "heart-attack gun"  [CIA photo]

According to DCI Bill Colby,

 the gun fired a projectile with the diameter of a human hair and a quarter inch in length, 

at an accurate distance of 250 feet.
[Colby was murdered in 1996]

The poison was a mixture of shellfish toxin and cobra venom and is virtually undetectable, other than a tiny red dot on the skin.

Other frozen darts consisted of a mixture of various viruses, which, once have passed through the skin and melted, would attack the internal organs of the victim, killing him slowly, sort of like the murder of John Gresham (an extremely healthy young man; his bodily functions slowly deteriorated until he did; he was  Tom Clancy's researcher.

[Alternate gun designs and attack mechanisms were in the form of a walking cane or umbrella [as used by a highly publicized Bulgarian assassin]

So, in the final analysis, we have Motive, Weapon, probable Culprit --
But, that autopsy report and witness statement tell a pretty interesting story.

The weapon fires a frozen projectile consisting of shellfish toxin and cobra [or krait] venom, which contains presynaptic and post-synaptic neurotoxins -- which shut down the nerve endings near the brain.  

The result is the shutting down of the body's infrastructure and command center -- cutting off muscle activity, and the ability to breathe ["60% narrowing of a major coronary vessel"] and stand [fell like a sack of potatoes].

Normally, Walking heart attack victims turn blue and drop in a more orderly fashion.  
But, Breitbart's skin color changed abruptly from normal to bright red, and 

"he collapsed like a sack of potatoes."

The frozen venom bullet, once having penetrated the skin, melted, releasing neurotoxins which shut down the nervous system and the muscle activity pumping blood to the lungs -- and to the brain -- which stopped; the heart stopped and the blood stopped flowing -- and then started up again briefly, causing the blood to rush back to the skin, causing it to become bright red.  But, by that time, Breitbart's brain had completely stopped -- so Breitbart was dead before he hit the pavement.  

[The witness who provided this statement was murdered not long after speaking up.]

The telling clue was that
"60% narrowing of a major coronary vessel and 'heart failure' cells in the lungs."  

The "heart failure" cells derived from the snake venom -- giving the appearance of a "heart attack" -- but the bright red skin symptom was the give-away; a heart attack would have been less abrupt, and there would have been no blood flushing activity after the heart attack -- and Breitbart would have turned blue instead.

The murder of Breitbart occurred shortly after he announced he would publish damning evidence about 0bama.

Update (22 July 2025):

That evidence will likely be released in the next ten days