Saturday, January 16, 2021

Trumps 's Long Game





We are reproducing, with some minor edits, this analysis by a 
Twitter poster designated @Maga77717;
it's an excellent analysis, and should put 
your mind at ease for the coming weeks. 




1. Trump was not running for just another four year election in 2016 - he was approached by the Military to run, and his entire win has been, and is still a Military Operation.

2. Trump’s first four years were designed to drain the lower Swamp first. The Swamp was/is deep and incorporated every industry in the world, banking, entertainment;, pharmaceutical, food; you name it, they control it; much has been handled. 


3. Before leaving office, Barack Obama signed an Executive Order to pardon anyone/everyone fo prior crimes in the government. This is why no one (e.g., Hillary, Comes, Clapper, Brennan, et al) was held accountable when Trump took office. 



4. Thus, these Swamp rats, to the bewilderment of America and the World, could not be tried for their crimes (i.e., Hillary's email scandal, the Clinton Foundation, Clapper's perjury in front of Congress, FISA spying on the Trump campaign etc.) 
~ only crimes AFTER Obama left office could triedtherefore, new crimes had to be snared

5. The Military needed to catch them in the act committing crimes, with incontrovertable evidence! 


6. President Trump said in his speech on 7 January 2021: 
there will be 
an orderly transition of power.” 

7. This in no way means that President Trump is transitioning power from his first term to Joe Biden! 
Did you hear him say Joe Biden? 



8. We are transitioning from the defunct United States of America Corporation to the Republic 
(not Biden). 
President Trump will not technically get a “second term” and as he tweeted, “won’t be at the Inauguration Day in January” ~ this means there won’t be an Inauguration Day

This was the last recorded term of any President who served in the “American Corporation”. 

9. President Trump dismantled the Banking Act of 1871 from England. 
The United States is going back to being a Republic and Donald J Trump will be 
the first President of the New Republic with the Constitution fully intact. 

[The Act of 1871 formed a corporation called THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 

The Act of 1871 changed our our original 
"Constitution of the united states for America
to the 
"THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" 

In 1871.The corporation, OWNED by foreign (Rothschilds) interests, 
reconstituted the original US Constitution, when the title was capitalized
 and the word “for” was changed to “of” in the title.  
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.]


10. The start date for the New Republic is 4 March 2021 
~ [this was the original start date of the new President (until it was changed under FDR in 1933)]. 



11. At the end of President Trump’s speech he said: 
Our incredible journey is only just beginning.”  

12. Trump won an overwhelming victory and will be the President ~ of the New Republic

13. The Swamp Rats needed to commit their crime during the last four years; and they have now been snared. 



14. Certifying a knowingly fraudulent election as Pence and Congress just did is Treason

15. Now, President Trump is still the President of the United States until January 20, 2021. 
He has the power to invoke the Insurrection Act which deals with Treason at a military level. 

16. Why did the President not involve the Insurrection Act before? 
Because it involves the military and people would have accused him of being a dictator. 


He has given ample opportunity for all to come clean with the fraudulent election; he has addressed the election directly with the Supreme Court, the DOJ, the courts, the Congress, and the Vice President. 

They all picked their lane, for the most part, and chose to certify a (knowingly) fraudulent election. 


17. Many Trump supporters have been pressured and threatened by the Deep State, they always have. People appearing to go against Trump have either been threatened or they are part of the Deep State. 
People have picked their lanes. 

18. Do not underestimate the President and this Military operation. 
Trump often appears weak before he wins (read "The Art of the Deal"). 





19.  Twitter and Facebook are now banning (censoring) the President 
~ this gives the President the opportunity to use the Emergency Broadcast System (it gives the POTUS the means to talk directly with the American public in the event of war, threat of war, or grave national crisis.   

In this case, it provides the means for President Trump to communicate to all Americans what they will need to hear regarding his next steps. 

19. Trump has said over and over: “we have it all (the evidence).” 
He has also said: The best is yet to come!” 

20. Do not watch or trust the MSM; they are Deep State
Do not give up. 
Keep the faith1


Monday, January 11, 2021

18 US Code: Treason

 



Since we anticipate the arrest, prosecution, and penalizing of a number of politicians (of both Parties), public officials, members of the Judiciary, and government bureaucrats, we thought we would prep you with what to expect.  The penalties for Sedition, Treason, Subversion, or Conspiracy to overthrow the US government, would include fines, imprisonment, and, when added to some other crimes, execution.  

Many of the perps with whom we are familiar are also involved in Human Trafficking, Pedophelia, Child Sexploitation, Satanic rituals in which children are kidnapped, sacrificed/killed.  Their actions were captured on videos recovered from Epstein's records. Public Execution of the worst of these perps must be expected so they can never again engage in any of these horrific acts.

Among the videos available now are of politicians casually discussing a coup against Trump, videos of two politicians discussing how to poison Trump, and videos of two elected officials comparing reviewing a cellphone video on how to blackmail one of their colleagues.  There are more, to include a notable Jurist raping a child whom he then shoots and kills - all on video to ensure blackmail against him.  

Also to be shared are videos of workers/volunteers in voting centers using bogus votes and running real votes through the system multiple times - after closing hours.  And, last but not least, is the complete documentation of the international conspiracy to manipulate the US Election this past November, including the transfer of billions of dollars among conspirators.

Notably, Treason alone is not the basis for the death penalty.

---------------

Abbreviated Sections of 18 US CODE are posted below.

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, 

or attempts to do so; 

or 

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof — 

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. 

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. 


-------

§2381: Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

§2382:Misprision of Treason

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises the desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; 

§2383: Rebellion or Insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

§2384: Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government


Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government
or 
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States; 
or 
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group to encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; 
or 
becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof— 

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. 

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

Sunday, January 3, 2021

China's Global Threat

China's Trojan Horse got us to disarm and cripple our Government


The following assessment is drawn from Jane's 
 "China's Logistics Capabilities for Expeditionary Operations
 Executive Summary


[Click here for the full report]

China is prioritizing three military development goals through 2030: 

        1. The ability to impose unacceptable costs on the access or freedom of maneuver within China’s first and second island chains. This includes the South and East China Seas, as well as the waters out to Guam. 

        2. The ability to contribute to international commons operations, which China perceives as the responsibilities of a great power.
[This is seen through China’s involvement in the Gulf of Aden anti-piracy task force missions and participation in overseas humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HA/DR) operations.] 

        3. Defending China’s overseas economic interests, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), including infrastructure and Chinese nationals overseas  The risk of terrorist activity targeting Chinese facilities and personnel is likely to be a major driver of People’s Liberation Army (PLA) expeditionary combat operations through 2030. 

-----

In pursuit of these goals, China has pursued both organizational reforms as well as new military capabilities to aid in expeditionary operations. As part of broader organizational restructuring beginning in 2015, the PLA created the Logistic Support Department (LSD) and Joint Logistic Support Force (JLSF) to better support joint operations.

The administrative separation of these two organizations divides responsibilities for force management and logistics implementation/operations support, countering corruption, enhancing joint logistics between the services, and better aligning the organizations with Central Military Commission (CMC) strategic planning.

The JLSF manages the implementation of the joint logistics support system, coordinating logistics, personnel, and supplies to theater commands.

Based at Wuhan Joint Logistics Support Base (JLSB), the JLSF directs five joint logistics support centers (JLSC) aligned with a specific theater command.

The LSD provides PLA-wide strategic logistics planning, coordinates military-civil fusion, and determines strategic priorities.

Together the two organizations are responsible for diverse logistics activities including inventory and warehousing, medical services, transport, force projection, oil pipelines, engineering and construction management, reserve assets management.

Additionally, both the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) are rapidly expanding their offensive and logistical capabilities.

These include the introduction of the PLAN’s
     (1) Type 055 destroyers,
     (2) Type 075 landing helicopter docks (LHD),
     (3) Type 901 fast replenishment ships, and
     (4) Indigenously-designed aircraft carriers (including the
           (a) Type 002 and future
           (b) future Type 003;
     (5) as well as the PLAAF’s
           (a) Y-20 strategic transport aircraft,
           (b) Y-20 tanker variant, and the
           (c) J-20 fifth-generation fighter.

Despite these advancements, the PLA is still in the early stages of developing its expeditionary military capabilities - but expanding rapidly


As one defense analyst argued in the South China Morning Post,
... bigger supply ships were no substitute for more overseas bases when it came to supporting the expanding mission of China’s naval fleets.

Many of the PLAN’s and PLAAF’s new capabilities help address long-standing deficiencies in expeditionary capabilities – including anti-submarine warfare, maritime air-defense, strategic airlift, and tanker aircraft – but China has not yet had the time to develop the doctrine or experience necessary to maximize their use of these new capabilities.

The PLAN’s primary replenishment capabilities lie in the nine Type 903A ships and two newly introduced Type 901 fast support ships, which are designed to support Carrier Groups.

Altogether, this auxiliary fleet is capable of supporting approximately 20-30 surface combat ships for 2-3 weeks without replenishment, with the Type 901s also supporting the PLAN’s two Carriers.

PLAN assets would need solid and liquid supplies from foreign civilian ports and/or domestic civilian container ships or tankers for operations exceeding that time period. 

The PLAN appears to be pursuing five basic expeditionary logistics models:
     (1) Accompanying five (5) replenishment ships, civilian ports, logistics bases, replenishment relays, and civilian underway replenishment (UNREP).
    (2) The PLAN and PLAN Marine Corps (PLANMC) may be developing the capability to conduct organic amphibious combat operations in the model of a US Marine Corps Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU).
    (3) The PLANMC has expanded to over 30,000 personnel in the last few years because of transfers from the PLA Army. Without foreign air bases and with limited aircraft carriers,
    (4) China has a limited capability to project airpower beyond limited amphibious operations using its Type 075 LHD, Type 075s,
    (5) in conjunction with Type 071 Landing Platform Docks (LPD) and other, smaller landing ships, may be able to conduct limited amphibious operations overseas,

[but a lack of rotary wing assets (due in part to competition for capabilities with the PLA ground forces) will severely limit PLANMC amphibious assault capabilities at least until 2030.]

Chinese analysts note that strategic airlift allows militaries to rapidly respond to emerging conflicts overseas, whereas naval power projection is significantly slower.

The Y-20, China’s new strategic transport aircraft, will significantly expand PLAAF expeditionary capacity by providing a rapid-reaction transport lift capability, but the lack of overseas airbases means that China will need to rely on civilian airports at least through the short term.

Chinese military analysts increasingly note the importance of military-civil fusion (军民融合) for expeditionary operations as well as China’s BRI interests.

China released several technical standards and laws beginning in 2015 that are designed to further military-civil fusion, including capabilities such as rollon/roll-off and container ships.

The PLAAF has also conducted exercises with civilian cargo aircraft companies so that these organizations can support expeditionary military operations if required.

In fact, Chinese companies already have experience supporting some noncombatant evacuation and HA/DR operations. While these capabilities have important limitations, particularly in their utility during armed conflicts, coordination with the military command and control network, and in meeting military construction standards, they are nevertheless capable of supplementing PLA capabilities for operations short of armed conflict and fulfilling an emergency reserve function.

Through 2030, China’s expeditionary capabilities appear primarily aimed at supporting the second and third goals above – the participation in international commons operations and the protection of overseas economic investments.

Critically, although the PLA will likely be challenged to sustain overseas combat operations or operations in hostile countries through 2030, China is nevertheless rapidly developing capabilities necessary to disrupt US interests in the Middle East, Africa, and throughout Asia.

China’s existing overseas operations in the Red Sea provide it with valuable experience and opportunities to develop expeditionary concepts of operations (CONOPS).

The United States should monitor signs that China’s overseas capabilities and/or goals have shifted, such as
1) The deployment of the PLAN’s Type 901 fast replenishment ship, Type 075 LHD, or Type 055 destroyer on overseas operations (particularly Gulf of Aden missions)
2) Pre-positioning of ordnance abroad, particularly at the Djibouti logistics support facility.
3) An increase in the Type 901 or Type 903A’s ability to transport solid cargo (for UNREP of ordnance)
4) An increase in the number of helicopters – for anti-submarine warfare, tactical transport, or attack – available to the PLAN and PLANMC
5)  An expansion in the number of Type 901 fast replenishment ships
6) The establishment of a military logistics facility for aerial replenishment or the frequent use of a foreign airfield

The PLA’s actual fixed overseas footprint may continue to remain light until approximately 2030 because it can still rely on civilian infrastructure and platforms to support its expeditionary operations.

However, after 2030, the PLA will likely pursue more dedicated military bases beyond its existing Djibouti Logistics Support Base.

The PLAN and PLAAF’s capabilities in 2035 would theoretically allow the PLA to perform higher level overseas combat operations, but operations in contested environments will almost assuredly require overseas military facilities or, at the least, preferred access to both ports and airfields in friendly countries.

Further, the PLA will still likely have limited capability to conduct operations in hostile countries [e.g., USA] with integrated air defense systems without support from future PLAN aircraft carriers. This may be difficult for the PLA given slowing economic growth and defense budgets.