Sunday, January 22, 2017

ObamaCare Reformed

This is another in a series of posts authored by those 
capable of intelligent analysis of complex and 
controversial subjects.  We share on the 
basis of educating our audience whom 
we trust will pass along this
analysis to others.

[via: J Duncan Barry]

"Liberals are notorious for caring about 'groups' of people, but when it gets down to individual persons, not so much. You’re about to see this play out in spades as Democrats cry crocodile tears over the coming repeal of Obamacare.

"You hear it over and over again: 
'This will be catastrophic for the 20 million people who were previously 
uninsured but now have coverage! You can’t take away their health care!'

"First of all, no one is talking about doing that. Any repeal legislation will have a transition period for those who got coverage through Obamacare to move to new plans. 
And second, they will have more choices and better options. Win. Win.

"But liberals would rather focus on quantity, how many millions we’ve given something to, versus quality, what does that 'gift mean for individual people.

"The Obama administration claims 20 million more Americans today have health care due to Obamacare. The reality is that when you look at the actual net gains over the past two years since the program was fully implemented, the number is 14 million, and of that, 11.8 million (84 percent) were people given the 'gift' of Medicaid.

"And new research shows that even fewer people will be left without insurance after the repeal of Obamacare. Numbers are still being crunched, but between statistics released by the Congressional Budget Office and one of the infamous architects of Obamacare, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Jonathan Gruber, it’s estimated that anywhere from 2 to 7 million people now on Medicaid would have qualified for the program even without Obamacare.

"That further discredits the [Obama] administration’s claim of 20 million more Americans having health insurance because of Obamacare.

"Multiple studies have also shown that even those who are uninsured often have better outcomes than those with Medicaid. A University of Virginia study found that for eight different surgical procedures, Medicaid patients were more likely to die than privately insured or uninsured patients. They were also more likely to suffer complications.

"And it is important to note that this study focused on procedures done from 2003-2007, prior to the geniuses in Washington deciding it was a good idea to put even more people on the already overburdened Medicaid system.

Try to control your bleeding while we take care of Jose's sniffles

"Additionally, despite what proponents of the law promised, there is little evidence to show that the use of emergency rooms, which have a higher level of medical errors, has decreased due to Obamacare.

"Then there is this reality: While Obamacare has handed out millions of new Medicaid cards, that does not mean the recipients now have quality health care. In fact, it doesn’t ensure they have health care at all. That’s because increasing numbers of doctors aren’t accepting Medicaid.

Useless if doctors won't accept it

"As a Louisiana woman told The New York Times
'My Medicaid card is useless for me right now. It’s a useless piece of plastic. 

I can’t find an orthopedic surgeon or a pain management doctor who will accept Medicaid.'

"Keep that in mind every time liberal Democratic senators pull out the Kleenex boxes bemoaning the fact Republicans are the ones trying to take people’s health care away."

We thank Mr Barry for his insightful analysis of the ObamaCare conundrum which continues to reign as the most catastrophic of the Obama legacy.

Monday, January 9, 2017

Democrats Hit Bottom

In our effort to promote discussion and disseminate words of wisdom, 
we periodically republish commentary from a variety of sources.  

This commentary is from Chris Parks, who exploded on FaceBook 
regarding the Democrats and Hillary.  We've kept our edits to a 
minimum, to include leaving in the vernacular expletives.

Democrats? knock knock knock: DEMOCRATS?

Listen up!

John Podesta is one your top people in the Democrat party. He is way up there at the top. Whatever he is, he is supposed to be one of your crackerjack best. Right? Must be a fucking GENIUS, I tell ya.

And he has an email account that was hacked and revealed to the public, the email that only the elite of the Democrat party was ever going to see, generated from the Democrat controlled email server that handled DNC email..............that one.

All of that technology and super duper, wiz bang, expensive IT.

And what does Podesta do with it?

First, his Password is............ <TADA> "Password!"

Next, he opened questionable email. You know, the kind with boogers in it? 
That kind. 
The kind that uses your computer to communicate somehow with the hacker's computer.

When you visit your old aunt, grandma, or even mom, you automatically get on their PC, and start removing viruses and trojans....... for exactly the same reasons: stupid password and opening infected email.

Podesta probably wasn't alone with moronic email administration, but the fact that he was at the top makes this even MORE damning on many levels. Podesta is a moron and an ass. He treated all of this with a cavalier attitude. And THIS is what you call a leader?

I am more than sure that State Department IT accounts for top level people handling electronic devices in the course of doing their job. This Podesta revelation means that the top Dems have below zero familiarity with electronic data transmission even on a consumer level. Read that again. Now remember Hillary nailed under similar circumstances for email and device usage. The fish rots from the head down.

It is now crystal clear that when you add Obama, plus Hillary, plus Kerry, plus Lynch, plus Podesta, plus the DNC, plus the Clinton Foundation, and on and on and on............
they are totally incompetent in administration, financing and cyber security. 
And that they are incompetent to the point of deluding themselves that they are doing things the right way. 
We constantly see them as ridiculously incompetent.

Except this is OUR USA too. And we don't want it to get all fucked up. 
And we don't give a shit about your fucking feelings, we give a shit about ours. 
Here's OUR fucking feelings. 

The Democrat Party, in its entirety, including the rank and file, is totally and irretrievably incompetent and corrupt. 
In addition to the total and complete failure of the Obama Administration, where you weren't convinced that he was incompetent in his first term, you re-elected him to prove it again, 

-- and then you run a damned CRIMINAL for President! 

1) Benghazi - watching via drone video as US Ambassador and three other Americans are assaulted and murdered, while denying nearby US Military units authorization to intercede and rescue them; and then to lie about it!

2) Covert movement of Libyan weapons to Al Qaeda in Syria

3) Clinton Foundation Money Laundering [$320 Million]

4) Pay to Play - Sale of 20% of US Uranium to Russian company -- for Foundation contribution 

4) DNC Convention manipulation -- causing the DNC Chair to resign!

Seth Rich turned over Podesta Emails to Wikileaks

It's like you used a fully loaded automatic weapon, shot yourself in both feet, 
and then RE-LOADED and shot 'em again!

But NOT "WTF" for you! 

Oh no! 
Tradition of Never Accepting Responsibility
It's the fucking RUSSIANS! 
What are you doing? 

A remake of the 1960's Alan Arkin movie The Russians Are Coming!??

It's over for you. 
You have thoroughly urinated all over yourselves several times and you stink from it. 
Video of you people is now the joke of the day.

In Alcoholics Anonymous, they say that in order to begin your recovery you need to hit bottom, first.

Democrats? You've hit bottom!

Post Script on 
#Russian Hacking:

John McAfee: 
"I'm going to be very frank with you and the American public. I think that today the most deceptive propaganda to date was perpetrated on American public."
After ripping the CIA's fake 'evidence' to shreds, McAfee summed it up like this:

"It's not just flimsy. It's either this: 
1) it's propaganda, intended to incite the American people to anger toward Russia for some reason. 
2) our intelligence community is so ignorant and naive, that they should all be replaced."