Friday, December 16, 2016

Did Obama Declare World War 3?

Il Duce Obama; President for Life?

The latest round of straw-grasping by Mr Obama in his desperate, and unconstitutional attempt to derail the Presidential election is his fear-mongering that the evil Russians hacking was responsible for Mr Trump's massive victory.  It appears, however, that his bizarre attempt to create chaos in the Presidential election as a means to remain in power  seemed to be collapsing.

Mr Obama, however, has now upped the ante with the threat of World War 3, creating the Russian Hacking Hysteria, and  essentially declaring war on Russia for his assertion -- admittedly unsubstantiated -- that Russia "hacked the US Presidential election."

"I think ... when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections ... we need to take action. And we will — at a time and place of our own choosing. Some of it may be explicit and publicized; some of it may not be."
That, in essence, is a unilateral declaration of WAR

[Obama, notably, does not believe his authorization to the US Intelligence  Community to hack the Israelis, or to hack Chancellor Merkel's personal/official phone conversations was illegal. (Umm, well, that's different!)]

The allegations against the Russians arose during the election, but Obama was unconcerned until Trump unexpectedly trounced Hillary, and Obama and Hillary now fear they might don orange jump suits if Trump takes office and allows the FBI to serve the warrants they've held onto for years now.

Mr Putin, that Bozo over there is CIA Chief Brennan!
Mr Putin has repeatedly dismissed this charge, and Dmitri Peskov, Kremlin spokesman, responded:

"...either stop talking about it, or finally produce some evidence"

Mr Obama has claimed that the US Intelligence Community has evidence and there is a Community consensus that the Russkies did it!

However, only Mr Brennan, who speaks SOLELY for the CIA,
 is the sole supporter  from the entire Intelligence Community who supports President Obama's assertion against the Russians.  

The rest of the US Intelligence Community

CIA Director Brennan announced 
"I met with ... Comey (FBI) and ... Clapper (DNI) and there is 'strong consensus' among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our Presidential election" 

This is a rather bland statement, and highly unusual in that a subordinate agency director [Brennan] would speak as if the Director of National Intelligence -- his boss -- were his subordinate.  This would indicate severe pressure was placed on Clapper and Comey to join Brennan's bogus charges.]

The DHS was identifies as the perpetrator of the election hacks in Georgia -- reportedly at the direction of President Obama.

Mr Trump has dismissed the CIA's assessment which ties the attacks on Podesta and the DNC to Russia; Trump has campaigned on improving US-Russia relations - much the same as Presidential Ronald Reagan did during the height of the Cold War.


It appeared that Obama's bizarre attempts to create chaos in the Presidential election as a means to remain in power [a process we've been monitoring for several years now] seemed to be collapsing.

The first level of that effort seems to have been an agreement with the GOP to change enough rules in the campaign to prevent Mr Trump from attaining the requisite number of popular votes through a campaign of slander and false witnesses accusing Trump of any number of misdeeds ranging from contractual disagreements to rape; oddly, all of Mr Trump's accusers faded into the woodwork when legally challenged.  And, with the massive turnout for Mr Trump by Mainstream America, the GOP decided to jump on Trump's bandwagon lest their constituents run them out of office.

Then, of course, came the push for Electoral College votes, presuming s large popular vote for Hillary would give her the Electoral Votes she needed. But, the popular vote in the states she presumed were hers [Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio] were cast for Trump, giving him 306 [56%] Electoral Votes to Clinton's 232 [43.1%].

So, Obama then sponsored a legal challenge to the Electoral College through the efforts of Jill Stein, who suddenly found herself with an extra $6.5 million [she only raised $1 million for her Presidential campaign], a vote recount was conducted in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, and the results revealed corruption, but the corruption lay in the bogus ballots counted for Hillary -- and Trump ended up with a greater percentage of the popular vote following the recount.

In Wisconsin, the Recount resulted in Hillary's losing 50,669 votes, while Trump had a net increase of 43,531 votes; the final tally gave Trump a margin of 22,000+ votes. 

In Michigan, the Recount was officially terminated after mass voter fraud was determined -- particularly in Detroit.  

The conclusion of studies at Berkeley and Stanford [somewhat Left of Center but still credible]

-- And, in California, where a cursory evaluation of the votes was conducted, it appears that an estimated three million illegals voted in the Presidential election 
-- with encouragement by President Obama.  

Currently, Hillary supporters claim she won the election since the popular vote count was somewhat greater than Trump's, albeit those votes were in states where she had already won the Electoral Vote. 

Those three million votes by illegals likely contributed to Hillary's popular vote winning margin of about two million.

But, now, the Big Spin began, with the Media in full force behind Obama's claim that 
Those damned Russians rigged the election for Trump by "HACKING THE NEWS!

Imagine that!

Not your average enemies
We marvel at this allegation since Trump has certainly not been given a thumbs up by the Putin. 

Far from it, although Trump did state quite clearly that he would look forward to discussions with Mr Putin, much the same as Mr Reagan conducted discussions with Mr Gorbachev to

"Tear Down This Wall"

- which Mr Gorbachev did, assuring an era of peaceful coexistence with the Russians for several decades.

Notably, Hillary was Putin's favorite since she had already given Russia control of about 20% of the US uranium reserves in a secret and very profitable deal while she was Secretary of State. The deal was with Canadian company Uranium One, owned by Russian investors. In exchange, Hillary received a bribe of $2.35 million via a "donation" from Uranium One's chairman to the Clinton Foundation.

Bill Clinton then received a $500,000 "honorarium" for a brief speech to a Moscow bank.

Frank Giustra: "For the children!"
And then, Frank Giustra, a mining financier, donated $31.3 Million to the Clinton Foundation.

Oddly, no one in Hillary's State Department staff claimed to have known anything about these financial transactions which were completely illegal.

Hillary stands to be indicted for this deal since it violated National Security, State Department, and Department of Commerce
regulations. We suspect the FBI already has those indictments in hand, ready to deliver on 20 January 2017.

But, we've digressed front the basic topic.

Did those mean old Russkies hack the US election process?

Well, according to the experts, there was hacking going on, and the FBI cyber investigators were pretty sure it was going on. However, they were unable to determine the perpetrators, although Bernie's campaign seemed to be the target.

SecureWorks claim, "with moderate confidence" that "threat groups" were operating from Russia targeting military, government, and non-government organizations. Early breaches of the DNC were discovered by, ummhh, Dmitri Alperovitch, a Russian "security expert" who investigates "Russian hacks" -- and makes his living tracking down and "countering" Russian hacks; he is apparently the only human who has this talent.  
"Look, Look, I see a Russian Hack!"

Why, that's downright convenient.

Died of "Heart Failure"  [like JFK]
Oddly, the perp [or at least one of them] was the infamous Romanian "Guccifer" who penetrated Hillary's email server, was found "... dead in his jail cell"
-- still another in that long list of mysterious Clintonian suicides
the most remarkable string of coincidental deaths 
[of potential witnesses agains Billary] in US history.

But, Guccifer had one last trick up his sleeve. When Julian Assange went missing, Guccifer's Dead Man's Switch kicked in and furnished 100 new pages to the FBI to release.

But, let's also consider the False Flag attack, and organizations and companies which specialize in such actions.  One such company is Attack Research, LLC [AR], a company which DARPA reportedly funded to study "vulnerabilities" of government entities, and which now extends its targeting to corporations, and, perhaps to political campaigns -- not that we would accuse AR of such conduct, but, it is within their capability -- mind you, strictly to test vulnerabilities.

So, the string of leaks via "Russian Hacks" has continued, in spite of the disappearance or deaths of Assange and Guccifer, and we suspect the Starfishing [exponential leaks by Assange links around the world] will continue to be blamed on Russian hackers.

That would all make for an excellent and believable tale, but, in reality, it appears we have still another False Flag operation.

Most interesting, in conclusion, is the report that the hacks were conducted by the Department of Homeland Security -- at the direction of President Obama.  It seems the hacks were traced back to DHS via the IP address -- the signature of the server sending the hacks.

If proven, Mr Obama can be charged with a variety of felonies, to include Treason.
We suspect that DHS personnel involved would likely turn State's Evidence and testify against Mr Obama

This is no longer political theater if it puts our country at risk.

And, as our little friend Pogo announced so many years ago via Walt Kelly's comic strip:

"We have met the enemy, and it is us!

[or rather, it is our Oval Office incumbent]

Monday, December 12, 2016

Julian Assange Dead?

 Story Link

5 Signs Julian Assange 

Is Missing Or Dead

There is a growing belief that Julian Assange is either missing or dead. Here are five reasons why WikiLeaks supporters are fearing the worst

It is more than six weeks since Julian Assange suddenly disappeared and WikiLeaks supporters are growing increasingly frantic and disillusioned with the organization for failing to follow through with promises to verify their founder’s safety and well-being.
There is a growing belief that WikiLeaks has not proved Julian Assange is alive and well because he is not alive and well – and if that is the case then WikiLeaks, the world’s premier speakers of truth to power, has been compromised.  
Here are Dark5’s reasons why WikiLeaks supporters are fearing the worst
5. Altered Hash
To protect Julian Assange, WikiLeaks has been maintaining encrypted files that are supposedly damaging to world governments. Some now believe something weird is happening after updates to these insurance files have failed verification tests. The passwords to these files are allegedly linked to a “dead man’s switch” and will be released if the Wikileaks founder is ever captured or killed.  
With each update WikiLeaks verifies the files using a “hash” code that would change if any information had been altered. The latest “2016-11-17” files, however, failed to match a pre-released hash and has raised concern among many supporters that WikiLeaks has been compromised.
WikiLeaks tweet
WikiLeaks tried to calm fears but skeptics worry a hostile actor may be corrupting the files and spreading false information.
4. Internet outage
The altered “hash” controversy is closely linked to an alarming flurry of tweets sent by Assange or WikiLeaks in mid-October in which pre-commitments were sent for files that seemingly threatened the U.S., Ecuador and the U.K. governments.
Some believe Assange may have released the information in a hurried panic before he was seized or harmed in a raid. The following day WikiLeaks stated that Assange’s internet had been “intentionally severed by a state actor.” The organization then cryptically claimed they had “activated the appropriate contingency plans” without elaboration.
WikiLeaks supporters outside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London photographed a new and heavily armed “police” presence.
3. “Heard” but not seen
Even if Assange is merely cut off from the internet, many are wondering why he can’t communicate online via a cellphone. He has yet to be seen alive on video since the chaotic incident and has supposedly “appeared” via voice only once on a phone call to a software conference in Buenos Aires. The call was rife with technical difficulties and many believe the interview was not actually live as claimed, but rather pre-recorded. Assange didn’t respond naturally to questions or delays due to technical problems.
Assange could easily make an appearance at his window to reassure the world he is alive and safe, but only his “Embassy cat” has been seen and photographed by observers.
The WikiLeaks twitter account has tried to fill the void left by Assange, but some worry the account may also be under hostile control.
It continues to assure that Assange is alive, yet has ignited requests to verify the statements with his PGP private key. After conducting a poll as to how supporters would like it to verify Assange’s wellbeing, it failed to follow through with the proof.
2. Tweet storm 
The recent bizarre activity of the WikiLeaks twitter account has only reinforced rumors of a conspiracy to discredit the group. Since Assange went dark, many tweets have been made in an unusual tone and have delved into unusual territory.
Tweets have been rife with uncharacteristic spelling mistakes, and including vague, ominous, and self-aggrandizing statements. WikiLeaks followers have been left wondering who the new voices belong to, because they don’t sound at all like Assange.
DDoS attacks have also been launched in the U.S. to take down popular websites, supposedly in support of WikiLeaks.
Some fear that if Assange has been harmed, a campaign is under way to distract the public and block the release of damaging new files.
1. Court “Appearance”
Even the one “official” appearance that could have proved Assange is still alive is clouded in confusion and mystery.
Assange was scheduled to be questioned by Swedish prosecutors the day after his Internet was cut in October, but it was suddenly rescheduled for the following month to supposedly allow his lawyer to attend.
At the November interview, however, his lawyer was not allowed to enter the building and Sweden was only allowed to submit questions in writing. Sweden planned to take a DNA sample from Assange for their investigation, but it is not known if they ever saw him in person.
Where is Julian Assange?
We just don’t know. 
However it appears that the powers that be have forced Assange into a state of quantum flux, neither alive nor dead.

If he were alive, the public could rally behind him. If he were dead, he would be a martyr and the powers that be would face a huge backlash. 

The only intelligent thing to do is to keep him in limbo, then neither of these things happen.