Thursday, May 19, 2016

Obama's Illegals Army

We'll be Obama's Army and we'll blow your white asses away!


President Obama's program, with GOP complicity, has been to allow illegal aliens to enter the US Military under a provision which creates "backdoor amnesty" to DACA [Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals].  Translated, that means DOD enlisting the "children" [mostly of Military age] we've seen streaming into the US under the auspices of DHS bus transportation to "FEMA Camps" guarded by US Marshals and credentialed and paid via after-hours Social Security office visits.

Now, normally, we'd think our Conservatives in Congress and the Senate would block such a huge gap in Military security, which would give illegals access to not only military weaponry and equipment, but also fully authorized uniformed status and rank which would enable them to direct Military action [e.g., firing upon] against US citizens the Government deems "... pose a potential threat" to the country.  Notably, in that status, they would be privy to the intelligence on US citizenry gathered by NSA -- stored and accessible now to DHS, and also to local law enforcement as well as the military.

Vets Had guns in Combat!
You'll recall that DHS has already declared our combat Vets "potential terrorists", it's certainly not a stretch to recall the litmus test a while back for the selection of general officers which included their agreement to
"... fire on US citizens, if ordered".

Our illegals in uniform most certainly would not hesitate to fire on US citizens, if ordered, since many of them have already engaged in violent assaults on, and murder of US citizens.  Give them an Army uniform and an M-16, and full authority, and they'll be more than happy to round up civilians and execute them.

North Korean Executions
Sound extreme?

For those of you who have browsed the history of Socialist and Communist countries [e.g., Cambodia, China, Soviet Union, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, etc.] there are ample examples of precisely that type of government abuse.


Would I screw over US Soldiers?
So, how is this happening.

1)  We're electing corrupt Left Wing politicians to office without regard to their credentials; these include both Democrats AND Republicans [RINOs (Republican In Name Only).

2)  We are not questioning the actions of these turn-coats, or holding them accountable for their unconstitutional behavior [notably, Senator Cruz and House Speaker Ryan].




The methodology for this particular episode:

1)  Under the language of the NDAA [National Defense Authorization Act], a comprehensive Defense budget scheme funding everything from bullets to the transfers of weapons and equipment to DHS and local sheriffs, there is a provision now which authorizes the integration of illegal aliens into the US Military via the DACA.

Representative Paul Gosar
2)  Representative Paul Gosar [R-AZ] initiated an Amendment which would have blocked illegal aliens from enlisting in the US Military, and would have allowed only aliens LAWFULLY in the US, who had entered LEGALLY, to enlist, and whose "enlistment would serve the National Interest".
     a)  In 2015, the House Armed Services Committee approved a provision requiring the Pentagon to review the enlistment DACA illegals in the US Military.
     b)  Representative Mo Brooks [R-AL] won approval in the House to eliminate that provision.

So I cut your pay and benefits;
don't get huffy!


3) Gosar's Amendment this year was removed in "mark-up" [editing] by Speaker Paul Ryan and replaced by a "compromise" Amendment by Representatives Mac Thornberry [R-TX] and Ruben Gallego [D-AZ] that ENCOURAGES the Secretary of Defense to enlist DACA recipients into the Military.

4)  Speaker Ryan then placed the Thornberry-Gallego Amendment up for a VOICE VOTE, and was approved.

5) Reportedly, the House Rules Committee killed the Gosar Amendment;







We've listed, below, the Representatives responsible for the embrace of illegals
[notably, all were Republicans:

a) Pete Sessions          [TX-R]
b) Virginia Fox          [NC-R]
c) Tom Cole                [OK-R]
d) Rob Woodall          [GA-R]
e) Steve Stivers           [OH-R]
f) Doug Collins           [GA-R]
g) Bradley Byrne        [AL-R]
h) Dan Newhouse       [WA-R]
i)  Paul Ryan               [WI-R]   House Speaker
j)  Kevin McCarthy   [CA-R]   Majority Leader
k) Steve Scalise          [LA-R]   Majority Whip
l)  Cathy Rodgers      [WA-R]  Conference Chair

6) The backdoor process to integrating illegals into the US Military comes under the Obama program called Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest [MAVNI], which ostensibly opens a path for "immigrants with critical language and/or medical skills" to serve in the US Military.

Gosar pointed out that there was no provision for screening these immigrants, thus there was no barrier to illegals -- creating a serious security vulnerability in the process.
 
Representative Gosar's plea to the House Rules Committee to allow a Floor Vote on his Amendment was tabled by Chairman Pete Sessions [TX-R].
Gosar commented:


"It's time that we stop playing politics with the Defense Authorization
and ensure that a provision meant to allow military readiness isn't 
hijackedin order to provide backdoor amnesty to DACA aliens. 

"Sadly, open border advocates have once again put politics ahead
 of the needs of our men and women in uniform in attempting
 to enact President Obama's lawless immigration agenda." 

"There is no labor shortage and we are in the midst of eliminating 
160,000 uniformed personnel positions over a nine-year stretch.  
Given this fact, it is wrong for the Obama Administration to prioritize 
enlisting illegal immigrants over Americans and legal immigrants 
that want to serve our nation."

There is something inherently wrong with this picture.
We could rationalize all this if the culprits were Godless Democrats leading us to perdition.

But, these are REPUBLICANS, damn it!
Republicans we voted into office to counteract Obama's destruction of our Military, of our Constitution, of our NATION!

Who ARE these people!
We don't recognize them as Republicans, Democrats or any type of representation.
These politicians don't represent us; they are protecting The Establishment which seems intent on the destruction of the United States of America.

We cannot fathom why!

Replace them at the polls this November!


Sunday, May 15, 2016

Hillary - GOP's Choice?




We are of the opinion that the GOP threw both the 2008 AND the 2012 elections -- and that it is about to throw the 2016 election as well.  Mainstream America, however, may block that path, and elect a non-politician antithetical to the political corruption endemic on Capitol Hill.

In 2008, Sarah Palin was a logical pick for VP for the "War Hero" McCain -- a shoo-in against Obama, a junior, unaccomplished senator of questionable citizenship [sort of like Cruz];  Palin, an attractive, accomplished family woman with a superb record of responding to, and support of her constituents and the state of Alaska, would normally have been a Media Darling -- except she had acquired an extremely powerful enemy -- Exxon and the oil industry -- when she forced Big Oil to share its revenue/profits with the citizens of Alaska, from whose territory the oil companies were extracting huge profits, and who were polluting both the land and waters.

Palin kicked their butts in Alaska, and garnered enough payment from Big Oil to eliminate the income tax for her Alaskan constituents.  And, Big Oil continues its slander campaign against her recognizing she will likely be included in the Trump Administration.

And the GOP stood aside and let Big Oil propaganda machines destroy her candidacy, and completely ignored McCain as the GOP Presidential candidate.  They ran a highly effective Media campaign, highlighted by Saturday Night Live, portraying her as an ignorant peasant woman of no merit, and even bought a house next to Palin's so the Media could have 24/7 access to every movement in her house, and to monitor every word she uttered.  All this for a Vice President candidate?
A first in the history of US elections.

But, Big Oil knew that if Sarah were in the national limelight, she'd go after Big Oil -- to include Warren Buffett's highly polluting and dangerous oil trains -- and make them not only clean up after themselves, but pay a higher price to the American people.

Would McCain have made a better President?
At worst, he would not have been as bad as Obama [but we'll reserve our criticism of him for another time].

But, then, after two years of Obama, American voters rebelled against both Obama AND the GOP, electing Tea Party candidates to replace the worthless Obama acolytes from the GOP.

The Tea Party, a new political force, has many rough edges, but its independence and focus on supporting their constituents vs special interests was refreshing.  Nonetheless, the GOP managed to gather enough blackmail on them, and offer them special benefits, that they eventually fell into line with the GOP leadership.

The GOP was surprised when Scott Brown, a Tea Party Independent unexpectedly beat Martha Coakley in a landslide victory, the Establishment's Democrat candidate who ran for Ted Kennedy's seat.  Brown filled the remainder of Kennedy's term, but, when the GOP determined Brown voted independently, they joined forces with the Democrats  -- and supported Elizabeth Warren to defeat him.  Brown then shifted to New Hampshire to run against Jeanne Shaheen, who as governor, had reneged on her promise of "no new taxes", and as senator, endorsed ObamaCare, and supported gun control -- all opposed by her constituents.  Nonetheless, with GOP support, she defeated Brown.

And then, in 2010, we watched in horror as the GOP campaigned against its own candidates to defeat them, and elect their Democrat opponents.  And the GOP told us these GOP or Tea Party candidates were crazy, and wouldn't represent THE PARTY very well because they were an embarrassment.

But, when we dug into the history of those candidates, we learned that they each had independent streaks, couldn't be bought, and had declared they would represent their constituents rather than bow and scrape to THE PARTY.

Most notable was Sharron Angle in Nevada, running against Harry Reid -- the most despicable Democrat in the Senate, and the Senate Majority Leader who gave us ObamaCare.

Angle had whipped all the other GOP candidates in the Primaries by large percentages and was leading Reid in the election by 10 points when the GOP marshaled its forces and the Las Vegas Media to condemn Angle as a crazy woman who had expressed an interest in witchcraft when she was in high school. And, the GOP elected Harry Reid to return to the Senate.

We learned only later that the GOP opposed her because she had challenged the GOP governor's tax plan as unconstitutional, and fought that battle all the way to the Supreme Court, paying the costs out of her own pocket -- and she won!  The GOP never forgave her, and recognized she'd be an independent force to reckon with should she be elected to the US Senate where she would most likely be outspoken in her condemnation of GOP [and Democrat] corruption.

In 2011, we had Benghazi, which should have led to Obama's impeachment since all indicators pointed to a White House-State Department-Pentagon collusion.

The facts were there, yet the GOP did nothing in the face of blatant lies about our Military not having the capacity to respond for at least 16 hours -- a lie which was dispelled by evidence that we had at least one counter-terrorist ship parked off the coast of Benghazi loaded with SpecOps troops and aircraft, plus the Sixth Fleet, plus AfriCom forces, plus European Command forces -- all of whom had been ordered to stand down.

But, the GOP Congress pointedly refused to acknowledge the blatant lies and only raised lackluster complaints and investigations into that conspiracy -- alluding to all who questioned the official stories of Hillary and Rice and Jarrett as conspiracy theorists wearing tin-foil hats.

And, we gradually came to understand through Benghazi Committee testimony and Wikileaks releases of official documents, to include Hillary's classified emails, that all those accusations were accurate, and the evidence mounted that the GOP leadership had not only been aware of the White House - State Department - Pentagon collusion, they had been part of the conspiracy.

By 2012, even Obama doubted he could get reelected, and Romney had him on the ropes after demolishing Obama in the first debate.

In the second debate, all Romney had to do was respond with force against Candy Crowley and demonstrate he was a strong leader with the experience to fix the problems of the US economy.

Barack, I concede the election to you and Candy!
Instead, Crowley's blatant lie on Benghazi caught him like a deer in the headlights, and in that moment, Romney lost the confidence of Mainstream America.

Romney remained mute, and let Crowley cow him with her attack on national TV, and the American people figured this wimp, who clearly couldn't defend himself against a lying, conniving, obese, witch wasn't the leader they thought he was.




And, he still could have won the election had he paid attention to the famous Bill Clinton slogan being shouted from the rooftops:
'IT'S THE ECONOMY, STUPID!"

All he had to do was present to America his track record of creating tens of thousands of jobs.
But, mysteriously, he omitted those facts from his campaign.  At this point, it was clear he was throwing the election.

And, Obama was reelected.
And Congress, both  Democrats and  Republicans, were then free to continue their corruption unfettered.  And, Mainstream America was bewildered.

By 2014, the American Rebellion continued, and more Democrats were evicted, and more Tea Party candidates came to Capitol Hill, but more were corrupted by either promises of Party support for reelection, or perhaps coercion.

In 2015, Congress jumped on the money wagon to pass Obama's Fast Track package for the Trans-Pacific Partnership {TPP}Trade Proposals which would bar Congressional Members and Senators from
1) Submitting amendments to trade proposals
2) Limit how long proposals can be debated
3) Restrict dilatory tactics that create a 60-vote hurdle in the Senate

Essentially, Congress voted to opt out of the Trade Proposal process, and to remain ignorant of the content of those proposals -- not what we call due diligence in fiscal responsibility, and in direct contradiction to the Constitution -- passing its powers of legislation and Executive Oversight to the Oval Office.

How did this happen?  Were they coerced? or, were they bought.
You're Right!
It was door number 2, and the bill passed Congress by eight [count them] 8 votes!

Who paid what and to whom?
The money came from Wall Street, Big Pharma, Defense Contractors, and lobbyists for special interests.  Interestingly, the Republicans took most of the money, and many Democrats abstained.

Open Secrets and MapLight identified 346 companies [e.g., Monsanto, Google, Facebook, Lockheed Martin, Pfizer, and Walmart] and key organizations provided the bribes.

A sampling of the payouts and recipients:

HOUSE:  [partial list; note, Democrats can be bought for less]

 1)  John Boehner:        (R-OH)   $5.3  Million
 2)  Paul Ryan:               (R-WI)   $2.4  Million
 3)  Kevin McCarthy:    (R-CA)     $2.4  Million
 4)  Pat Tiberi                 (R-OH)    $1.6  Million
 5)  Jim Hines                 (D-CT)    $1.14 Million
 6)  Pete Sessions           (R-TX)    $1.06 Million [House Rules Committee Chair]
 7)  Bob Goodlatte         (R-VA)      $1     Million
 8)  Ron Kind                 (D-WI       $1    Million
 9)  Cathy Rogers          (R-WA)      $900,732
10)  Mike Pompeo         (R-KS)      $949,708
11)  Marsha Blackburn  (R-TN)      $700,687 [voted for uncontrolled immigration]
12)  Ami Bera                (D-CA)     $602,985
13)  Gerry Connolly       (D-VA)     $408,305
14)  Don Beyer               (D-VA)     $461,454
15)  Rick Larson             (D-WA)    $359,965
16)  Earl Blumenauer     (D-OR)     $352,711
17)  Debbie Wasserman Shultz  [ D-FL] $303,400 [Chair: DNC]
18)  Suzanne Bonamici   (D-OR)   $273,500


SENATE:

 1)  Mitch McConnell  (R-KY)  $9.01 Million
 2)  John Cornyn           (R-TX)    $5.30 Million
 3)  Mark Warner          (D-VA)    $5.04 Million
 4)  Claire McCaskell   (D-MO)   $4.4   Million
 5)  Mike Bennett         (D-CO)   $4.36 Million
 6)  Marco Rubio        (R-FL)    $4.17   Million
 7)  Ted Cruz               (R-TX)   $3.70 Million
 8)  Tim Kaine              (D-VA)   $3.66   Million
 9)  Ron Wyden            (D-OR)   $3.4   Million
10) Lindsey Graham    (R-SC)    $3.4 Million
11) Dianne Feinstein   (D-CA)   $2.86 Million
12) Jeanne Shaheen    (D-NH)   $2.02 Million

[Note: Figures are cumulative and reflect the varying stages of the Bill from introduction to name and content changes to enactment]

How did this Bill even get to the floor without public awareness?

On 12 May 2015, HR 2146 [Defending Public Safety], a routine bill for benefits for Law Enforcement Officers and Firefighter retirement funds passed the House 407-5.

My Bible Proves I'm Pure


On 4 June 2015, Ted Cruz added the magic amendment "with changes" to the House Bill, adding "TPA" [Trade Promotion Act] and "TAA" [Trade Adjustment Assistance (offset US worker job loss due to international trade agreements)] with "unanimous consent".


Me?  Corrupt?
Paul Ryan then picked up the ball and accepted the TPA change, but removed the TAA [a financial assistance package to train union workers].  Pelosi objected, but was coerced by Obama to go along with the package.  The House then passed the bill again, but with greater opposition this time [218 -  208] and sent it to the Senate where Ted Cruz maneuvered it through with a 60-38 vote.


The TAA element was the kicker here, since politicians of either Party who voted against this Bill would be accused of voting AGAINST benefits for Police and Firefighters -- the kiss of death in local elections back home.

On 29 June 2015, President Obama signed the Fast Track Trade Promotion Authority into law, giving the Executive Office unprecedented power and gutting Congressional oversight.

To further emasculate Congress, Senator Cruz defeated an amendment contained in HR 1314 that would have required Congress "to be consulted" if China [or other nations were to join after the fact.


Meanwhile, Trump was protesting the deal noting that TPP carried a "backdoor for China and Russia to join" this trade agreement -- which Cruz and Rubio had officially denied.






However, Secretary of State John Kerry, on 4 November 2015] invited China and Russia to join the TPP.  This followed declarations by Cruz and Ryan that neither China nor Russia would be allowed to participate in the TPP.



So, now that you are completely outraged and frustrated by this Byzantine corrupt political process, you might ask:
How do these sleazy SOBs get away with this!
Why don't the new politicians raise a stink?
Why not prosecute them!

Two words:
1) Bribes:  From the day Congresspersons are elected, they spend virtually all their time soliciting campaign donations and campaigning for reelection, selling their souls to get reelected.  Sometimes, they even have time to represent their constituents.  Some even do that well - specifically those who have made their fortunes before arriving on Capitol Hill, such as Darrell Issa [R-CA] and Thomas Massie [R-KY].

2) Blackmail:  This practice goes back to the LBJ Administration, which employed J Edgar Hoover to illegally wire offices in both the House and the Senate; LBJ then used recordings of the politicians to coerce them into supporting is initiatives; in some cases, he even used videos recorded in condominiums of his White House "hostesses" who invited newly elected Representatives and Senators [geographical bachelors] to their "homes".   Later, those wiretaps were reactivated by Clinton Administration and First Lady Hillary who purloined the "Background Investigation" files from the FBI [we're not sure how she managed that], and which the Secret Service found in her bedroom.

But, all that is such "Old School" technology.  Today, Obama has the NSA and an obsequious Director of National Intelligence to pander to the every need of Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod to tap into every bit of communication of every politician and staffer on Capitol Hill, but that of their family members as well.  Essentially, no one on Capitol Hill is clean, except for the few who made their fortunes before being elected and have been smart enough to avoid NSA eavesdropping and DHS surveillance.

As you may have noticed, key bureaucrats and occasionally politicians who speak out against the crooks on Capitol Hill, or God forbid, against Obama, and find Men in Black at their doors at 3:00 am with "urgent safety updates" to discuss about very private family issues; in some cases with bureaucrats, arrests are made regarding specious allegations such as discovering child pornography on their home computers -- followed by quick trials in tiny courtrooms, and sentences of unique qualities.

So, the concept of truth and justice will win out is a stretch these days.
It is workable, however, if the incoming Trump Administration can rid the government of the Obama actives [and sleepers -- as we found following the Carter Administration] including a majority of the political appointees and replace them with professionals in the Department of Justice [we recall such days in the Reagan Administration].

An honest and professional DOJ would be capable of targeting the worst on Capitol Hill and certain agencies, and we firmly believe, with that lead, many on Capitol Hill would be more than willing to take plea bargains rather than have them and their families endure potential charges of corruption or treason to testify against the most corrupt on the Hill; the ultimate weapon is the potential loss of their lucrative federal pensions.

The end-product will be a strengthened Constitution, the same as we knew and understood throughout our history, through good times and bad.  It's really all up to Mainstream America in this Presidential Election.  We trust the American people can pull this off.

We do hope Mr Trump survives the campaign without being assassinated by Obama, the DNC, or the GOP [or all of the above] since it is certain that he will bring a new level of integrity to Washington.  We strongly suggest he surround himself with the very best and most trustworthy security personnel - and keep the Secret Service as his second tier [they weren't so effective with JFK and Ronald Reagan].
















Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Trump's Cabinet



In the wake of Mr Trump's designation of his future Attorney General -- Trey Gowdy, we'd like to review the most desirable appointments to key Cabinet posts, with our rationale

[Disclaimer: we have no control over whom Trump selects]

President Trump, on assuming the Presidency, following a landslide victory not seen since Reagan's massive win against Jimmy Carter in 1980.  The voters, this time, demanded CHANGE -- i.e., throw out the rascals in the Oval Office and all of Obama's appointees an Socialist generals, and hopefully, evict all the Congresspersons and Senators who have allowed Obama and his cabal to run roughshod over the US Constitution, our citizens and our nation.


Secretary of State:  
Jim Webb
1)  Marine officer, awarded the Navy Cross, Silver Star, Bronze Star [for Valor], Purple Heart
2)  Law degree from Georgetown University and Instructor at the US Naval Academy
3)  Assistant SecDef for Reserve Affairs; Secretary of the Navy
4)  US Senator [Va-D]
5)  Will provide Trump expert advice on Military and Diplomatic issues
6)  Understands both the House and the Senate and how to move legislation through.
7)  Will restructure the State Department to rid it of Left Wing radicals and select professionals for all key positions, and promote deserving career diplomats for ambassadorships.
8  The worst nightmare for the DNC/GOP cabal if they attempt to assassinate Trump [as they did with Reagan].  Webb would nail each conspirator to the wall and restructure both the DNC and the GOP.
9)  Will draw the votes of Democrats who are disgusted with Hillary or Bernie, as well as undecided Independent voters.

Secretary of Homeland Security: 
Rudy Giuliani
1)  A national hero who took the lead in the 9/11 crisis.  Knows his way around politics and can be counted on to remain Conservative in Economics and on Immigration issues.
2)  A backstop in the event the Establishment attempts to kill Trump as they did with Reagan; he won't hesitate to prosecute corrupt Congressional Representatives and Senators; look out Ryan, Boehner, McConnnell, Reid, Pelosi, Boxer, et al.
3)  He took on the mob, neutralized them, and somehow, he's still alive!
4)  Will eliminate the useless bureaucracy of 250,000 employees, cut the budget to realistic levels, and demilitarize DHS and eliminate its anti-American posture and redirect towards the external threat.
5)  Will eliminate DHS role in escorting illegals into the US, and reorient them to focus on neutralizing the illegal threat from within.





Attorney General:  
Trey Gowdy
1)  Demonstrated his intensity and tenacity in pursuing the Benghazi Hearings; fought off Boehner and Congressional pressure to force him to drop the investigation which would have revealed GOP complicity in the Administration's scheme.
2)  Can be counted on to pursue Hillary Clinton and the Obama Communist cabal, to include the Muslim Brotherhood operatives in the US Government.
3) Will indict and prosecute corrupt Congressional Representatives and Senators
[Look out Boehner, Ryan, Pelosi, McConnell, Boxer, et al.]



Secretary of Defense:
Allen West
1)  Former Congressman from Florida [Armed Services Committee]
2)  Army private, rose to rank of Colonel; Military Commander, deployed to Iraq Iraq [Desert Shield/Desert Storm
3)  Political Commentator
4)  Will purge political flag rank officers and promote combat-experienced officers to the highest ranks.
6)  Will restructure the Military into a realistic command structure rather than the Soviet-style Obama Military
7)  George Will hates him


Secretary of Commerce:  
Darrell Issa
1) Congressman [CA-R] Benghazi Probe
2) US Army Explosives Ordnance Disposal Specialist
3) US Army officer, rated as "Unlimited Potential"
4) Businessman, bought and turned around a failing car alarm company; started up Quantum Electronics for car security, coordinate with car manufacturers, and built his company into a highly profitable company.
5) Introduced [passed] the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act making federal expenditures transparent.
6) Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
7) Expected to be very supportive of small business


Secretary of Treasury:  
Newt Gingrich

1) Former Speaker of the House [1995-1999], led US voters to oust Democrat Congressional Representatives based on their profligate spending supporting Clinton programs.
2) Co-authored the Contract With America to cut wasteful government spending and balanced the budget.
3)  Restructured Welfare under the Welfare Reform Act and overrode Clinton's vetoes.
     a) Gave state governments autonomy over Welfare Delivery
     b)  Reduced federal government role in Welfare
     c)  Placed time limits on welfare assistance
     d)  Created stricter conditions on food stamp eligibility, and restrictions on immigrant welfare
     e)  Created work requirements for all welfare recipients
4)  Passed the Taxpayer Relief Act [1997]  which reduced taxes on capital gains [spurring private investment [Democrats today give Clinton credit for this act, which Clinton opposed]
5)  Passed the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 which subjected Congress to the same laws that apply to businesses and American citizens in general.
6)  Knows all the ins and outs of Capitol Hill and how to bring all Parties and partisans together in the national interest.  Trump could not have a better political advisor.
7)  Knows how to handle Media attack dogs and the Establishment pressure mongers.
8)  Knows where all the skeletons are on Capitol Hill.
9)  Understands the role of the Presidency, and particularly the Budget Process for streamlining federal expenses.
10)  Fully understands how to reform the US budget process and limit the powers of the Fed.





Secretary of Health & Human Services:  
Ben Carson
1)  Presidential Candidate
2)  Noted neurosurgeon; director of Pediatric Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins
3)  Yale grad
4)  Trusted Trump advisor
5)  Will likely revamp ObamaCare to eliminate unconstitutional aspects.
6)  Will likely streamline HHS to eliminate useless bureaucracy and trim budget



Secretary of Transportation:  
Tom Davis

1) Former Congressman [Va-R] [Moderate]
2) Chair: Republican Congressional Committee [1998 - 2002]
3) Chair: House Government Reform Committee [2003 - 2007]
4) Investigated George Soros for his attempts to buy Washington Nationals [baseball team]
[Soros retaliated by launching a scandal campaign against Davis]
5) Promoted the rapid development of Metro Rail in Northern Virginia
6) Investigated federal response to Hurricane Katrina highly critical of Bush Administration
7) Heavily involved in infrastructure development and renovation.

Secretary of the Interior:  
Sarah Palin
1) Former mayor, former governor of Alaska [the largest US state]
2) Took on Exxon and the other oil companies operating in Alaska and forced them to stop polluting and also toreturn some of the profits to the citizens, effectively eliminating the state income tax.
3) Will likely review oil company operations in the US to ensure environmental responsibility as well as safe transport.
4) Will restructure Bureau of Indian Affairs to honor treaties with the Indian nations and provide assistance as needed to Native Americans.


Secretary of Veterans Affairs:  
General James Mattis
1)  Military professional
2)  Understands the needs of Veterans
3)  Has no tolerance for corruption or useless bureaucracy
4)  Will likely fire the top tier of VA administrators, promote professionals from within, and appoint professionals from the Military retired ranks.




Commissioner: Customs and Border Protection: 
Joe Arpaio
1) Sheriff of Maricopa County, AZ since 1993
    a) Led the challenger against Illegal Immigration
    b) Brought law enforcement to a new level of effectiveness in
         his jurisdiction
    c) Developed a highly effective and admired prisoner
        incarceration program
    d) Under constant attack by the Obama Administration
        due to Arpaio's national popularity in law enforcement
2)  Expected to renew and solidify border enforcement and to back Border Patrol Police monitoring the whereabouts and activities of illegals in the US.



We will designate potential candidates for other Cabinet [and supporting posistions] as they emerge.  
We removed:
a)  Paul Ryan as a candidate for the Secretary of the Treasury after watching him bow and scrape to Obama and turn against US citizenry by promoting legislation which would increase taxes and government spending for worthless government programs.
b) David Petraeous as Secretary of State given his appearance as a key new player in the Bilderberg conference, indicating that he has sold out to the New World Order.

b) We added Newt Gingrich as Secretary of Treasury based on his accomplishment as Speaker of the House in balancing the budget and creating welfare reform.

c) We removed Condoleeza Rice as a nominee for Secretary of State as it appears she has sold out to The Establishment, being one of the "50 National Security Experts" who condemned Trump.  She's in bad company there since most can easily be labeled as "other than experts" based on their hand-in-glove and very profitable relationships with Establishment elements, 

Feel free to recommend.





Monday, May 9, 2016

Gowdy Indicts Pentagon

Chair of the Benghazi SubCommittee Trey Gowdy

Click here for related story [Independent Journal - #Katie Papotin]

With the announcement that Presidential nominee Donald Trump will designate Congressman Trey Gowdy as his Attorney General, the attacks on Trump, Gowdy, and the Benghazi SubCommittee have begun in earnest by the White House, the Pentagon, and Hillary Clinton.

Now, we have presumed that Mr Gowdy would be the most logical choice for Attorney General since he has been fearless as the Chair of the Benghazi Subcommittee in pursuing his investigation of all parties involved, but most appropriately, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton based on her alliance with former Egyptian President Morsi, whose operatives attacked the US Consulate in Benghazi.
[we presume this since the Libyan Security Force protecting the Consulate leapt to the defense of the Consulate and, when they began firing on the assault force, the leader of the assault unit was caught on a Libyan security camera shouting in Arabic "Don't shoot!  Morsi sent us!"].

The lead on this Administration's assault against Gowdy came from Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs, Stephen C. Hedger, who condemned Gowdy's Benghazi Committee for the "... crescendo of new requests for witnesses and information on an 'unrealistic timeline'."

Spontaneous Demonstration
Keep in mind that the attack on the Benghazi Consulate occurred nearly four years ago, on 11 September 2012! during which four Americans -- to include US Ambassador Stevens were slaughtered.  This full military assault, complete with a 37mm anti-aircraft artillery gun mounted on  a pick-up truck, and roughly a dozen al-Qaeda operatives from Egypt, was immediately dubbed a "spontaneous demonstration" by Hillary Clinton and the White House.

Recall also that Secretary of Defense Panetta ordered US Commanders at the European Command, the African Command, and the Sixth Fleet  in the Mediterranean, all of whom attempted to respond immediately, to include one counter-terrorist ship parked just off the coast of Libya, were all ordered to "Stand Down"!  The Commanders of the Sixth Fleet and AfriCom were relieved of their commands by order of Mr Panetta, acting on directions from the Oval Office.

AC-130 Gunship
Of late, we have confirmed that there was both a drone and an AC-130 Gunship on site feeding live video of the attack back to the Pentagon's National Military Command Center [NMCC], the National Military Intelligence Center [NMIC], the White House Sit Room, the State Department Bureau of Intelligence and Research [INR], and every US Military command center in Europe -- all of which were ordered to "Stand Down".

Mr Panetta's excuse for these orders was that it would have taken at least 16 hours to deploy a rescue force from the US -- but he did not explain why he ordered the AC-130 and the drone overhead already at Benghazi which were fully prepared to intercede on an immediate basis -- to Stand Down.

Finally, the question of the whereabouts of President Obama during this crisis has been clarified; it has been reported that he was in Las Vegas at the gambling tables, doubling down, and couldn't be bothered with this attack which took the lives of two former SEALs, the Ambassador's bodyguard, and, the Ambassador.

But, wait! There's more.
As the facts have trickled out, we have learned that GOP senators and congresspersons were aware of the Administration's plot behind Benghazi [i.e., to kidnap the Ambassador in order to exchange him for the Blind Sheik -- a scheme by Mr Obama to ingratiate himself with the Muslim Brotherhood.

So, Congressman Gowdy's letter responding to the Pentagon seems appropriate, given these horrendous facts surrounding Benghazi:

Your claim “…intentionally mischaracterizes both the nature of the Committee’s investigation and its interaction with the Department of Defense.
It is also riddled with factual inaccuracies, which not only does a disservice to the public but also does a disservice to the women and men who work for the Department of Defense.
Gowdy closes his letter by advising:
Your staff is welcome to waste taxpayer dollars writing partisan, factually deficient letters to out Committee, coordinate the language with House Democrats, and then leak it to the media. 

That is your prerogative. 

It will not prevent this Committee from interviewing all witnesses who can help us write the final, definitive accounting of what happened before, during , and after the attacks that killed four Americans in Benghazi and injured others. It will just prolong the investigation. I have been encouraged by too many soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines across the country to allow letters from political appointees to stop us.

Hillary:  What difference does it make!
 So, as we move into the final stages of the Presidential Election, we can understand why Mr Obama and his cabal, and Hillary Clinton are desperately fearful of the continuance of the Benghazi investigation and the facts it will reveal and publicize; but we also now grasp why the GOP is intent on derailing Mr Trump's bid for the Presidency -- knowing that, when he assumes office, Mr Gowdy will be appointed as Attorney General complete with a suitcase full of subpoenas including Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta, Mr Obama, and perhaps, a number of senators and members of Congress.

We will monitor this process very closely; our worst fear at this point is that the risk to so many ranking government officials will lead to a Breitbart moment for Mr Trump, much the same as the GOP attempted to assassinate Mr Reagan in order to install Mr Bush in 1981.





Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Obama Returns Gitmo to Castro

Obama is giving Guantanamo back to Cuba


Click here for related article [The Hill: Krisitna Wong]

While we're distracted with electioneering, President Obama has been busily negotiating away Guantanamo.

But, but, but that's unconstitutional!
Now, those educated in the Constitution [e.g., Senator Cruz] will leap to the fore to state that mean old Barack Obama had better not negotiate a treaty with Cuba to return Gitmo to the Cubans.

Why, that would be unconstitutional, and EVERYONE who knows the Constitution KNOWS that the Prez absolutely, positively MUST consult with Congress and seek its permission before he engages in negotiating a treaty, or any kind of diplomatic engagement.

But, in reality, Obama needn't bother Congress with his current maneuvering.

I got three right.

At the moment, he's pressuring the review board examination of Gitmo prisoners to release more prisoners.

Over the next few months, the board will have released the majority of them, leaving a minimum group to be dealt with; and Obama doesn't have to have any visibility in the process.




I am omnipotent!
The moment of truth, however, will come when Obama dons his Military Commander in Chief hat, when he

1) Orders the Military to transfer the remaining Gitmo prisoners to Leavenworth Military Detention Barracks, and

2) Orders the Marine Commandant to ship back all Marines currently stationed at Guantanamo.

3) After a few weeks, Castro will fill the facility with Cubans, and it will become occupied territory by Cuban squatters.

4) Obama can  ignore Congress' demands to retake the facility until he leaves office on 20 January 2017, and his replacement would have to literally declare war on Cuba to retake the facility.

And Obama will have pulled off still another end-run around Congress.

It's a shell game, but wait and see.

Gitmo by 20 January 2017
This is how it will play out, and the US will have no further control of Gitmo, and Obama will have the last laugh.




Trump's Revolution



The French dealt with their Elites with the Guillotine

This is another in our series of guest posts.
We look for excellent analyses and reproduce them 
to extend their reach as far as possible.
This one is from the Wall Street Journal  
by Peggy Noonan [25 FEB 2016]


We’re in a funny moment. Those who do politics for a living, some of them quite brilliant, are struggling to comprehend the central fact Republican primary race, while regular people have already absorbed what has happened and is happening. Journalists and politicos have been sharing schemes for how Marco parlays a victory out of winning nowhere, or Ted roars back, or Kasich has to finish second in Ohio. But in my experience any nonpolitical person on the street, when asked who will win, not only knows but gets a look as if you’re teasing him.

Trump, they say.

I had such a conversation again Tuesday with a friend who repairs shoes in a shop on Lexington Avenue. Jimmy asked me, conversationally, what was going to happen. I deflected and asked who he thinks is going to win.“Troomp!” He’s a very nice man, an elderly, old-school Italian-American, but I saw impatience flick across his face: Aren’t you supposed to know these things?

In America now only normal people are capable of seeing the obvious.

But actually that’s been true for a while, and is how we got in the position we’re in.

Last October I wrote of the five stages of Trump, based on the K├╝bler-Ross stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. Most of the professionals I know are stuck somewhere between four and five.

But I keep thinking of how Donald Trump got to be the very likely Republican nominee. There are many answers and reasons, but my thoughts keep revolving around the idea of protection. It is a theme that has been something of a preoccupation in this space over the years, but I think I am seeing it now grow into an overall political dynamic throughout the West.

There are the Protected and the Unprotected.
The protected make public policy. The unprotected live in it. The unprotected are starting to push back, powerfully.

The Protected are the accomplished, the secure, the successful—those who have power or access to it.

They are protected from much of the roughness of the world. More to the point, they are protected from the world they have created.

Again, they make public policy and have for some time.

I want to call them the elite to load the rhetorical dice, but let’s stick with the Protected.

They are figures in government, politics and media. They live in nice neighborhoods, safe ones. Their families function, their kids go to good schools, they’ve got some money. All of these things tend to isolate them, or provide buffers. Some of them—in Washington it is important officials in the executive branch or on the Hill; in Brussels, significant figures in the European Union—literally have their own security details.

Because they are protected they feel they can do pretty much anything, impose any reality. They’re insulated from many of the effects of their own decisions.

Refugees: No women, no children
One issue obviously roiling the U.S. and western Europe is immigration.

It is THE issue of the moment, a real and concrete one but also a symbolic one: It stands for all the distance between governments and their citizens.

It is of course the issue that made Donald Trump.

Britain will probably leave the European Union over it.

In truth, immigration is one front in that battle, but it is the most salient because of the European refugee crisis and the failure of the protected class to address it realistically and in a way that offers safety to the unprotected.

If you are an unprotected American—one with limited resources and negligible access to power—you have absorbed some lessons from the past 20 years’ experience of illegal immigration. 

You know the Democrats won’t protect you and the Republicans won’t help you. Both parties refused to control the border. 

The Republicans were afraid of being called illiberal, racist, of losing a demographic for a generation. The Democrats wanted to keep the issue alive to use it as a wedge against the Republicans and to establish themselves as owners of the Hispanic vote.
.
Many Americans suffered from illegal immigration—its impact on labor markets, financial costs, crime, the sense that the rule of law was collapsing. But the protected did fine—more workers at lower wages. No effect of illegal immigration was likely to hurt them personally.

It was good for the protected. But the unprotected watched and saw. They realized the protected were not looking out for them, and they inferred that they were not looking out for the country, either.
.
The unprotected came to think they owed the establishment—another word for the protected—nothing, no particular loyalty, no old allegiance.
.
Mr. Trump came from that.
.
Similarly in Europe, citizens on the ground in member nations came to see the EU apparatus as a racket—an elite that operated in splendid isolation, looking after its own while looking down on the people.
.
Not the daughter of an EU official
In Germany the incident that tipped public opinion against the Chancellor Angela Merkel’s liberal refugee policy happened on New Year’s Eve in the public square of Cologne.

Packs of men said to be recent migrants groped and molested groups of young women. It was called a clash of cultures, and it was that, but it was also wholly predictable if any policy maker had cared to think about it.

And it was not the protected who were the victims—not a daughter of EU officials or members of the Bundestag.

It was middle- and working-class girls—the unprotected, who didn’t even immediately protest what had happened to them. They must have understood that in the general scheme of things they’re nobodies.
.
What marks this political moment, in Europe and the U.S., is the rise of the unprotected. It is the rise of people who don’t have all that much against those who’ve been given many blessings and seem to believe they have them not because they’re fortunate but because they’re better.

You see the dynamic in many spheres. In Hollywood, as we still call it, where they make our rough culture, they are careful to protect their own children from its ill effects. In places with failing schools, they choose not to help them through the school liberation movement—charter schools, choice, etc.—because they fear to go up against the most reactionary professional group in America, the teachers unions. They let the public schools flounder. But their children go to the best private schools.
.
This is a terrible feature of our age—that we are governed by protected people who don’t seem to care that much about their unprotected fellow citizens.

And a country really can’t continue this way.

In wise governments the top is attentive to the realities of the lives of normal people, and careful about their anxieties. That’s more or less how America used to be. There didn’t seem to be so much distance between the top and the bottom.

Now is seems the attitude of the top half is: You’re on your own. Get with the program, little racist.

Social philosophers are always saying the underclass must re-moralize. Maybe it is the overclass that must re-moralize.

I don’t know if the protected see how serious this moment is, or their role in it.