|President's Morning Brief [Paul J Richards/AFP/Getty]|
Click here for related story [Wash Post: Marc Thiessen]
The Washington Post, along with much of the Liberal Media, dismisses the fact that the President of the United States has missed nearly 60 per cent of his morning intelligence briefings. But, the Media counters with the response that he actually read the print version of that brief, sometimes.
|Expendable Ambassador |
A "Bump in the Road"?
He stated that this assault and death of a US Ambassador was merely a "bump in the road", nothing to be concerned about -- unless you work in a US embassy.
So, what's the big difference between sitting in on the morning brief vs simply reading the hard copy report.
Short answer: Watching the movie Titanic vs reading the Cliff Notes.
Since we have considerable experience in this briefing process, from gathering the information, to analyzing it, to preparing and delivering the Morning Brief, we'll share what the big deal is.
|Will the Chinese Attack Pearl Harbor or Chicago?|
More goes into this morning report than goes into the morning edition of the New York Times or the Washington Post since thousands of analysts filter through millions of pages of field reporting by spooks, embassy officers of every specialty, Ambassadors' assessments, analyses by CIA Station Chiefs [COS] and Military Attaches [DATT], resident FBI and Treasury agents, and even Department of Commerce Commercial Attaches reporting on business trends [e.g., oil contracts].
Added to these Human Intelligence [HUMINT] reports and analyses are the National Security Agency's [NSA] Signals and Communications Intelligence [SIGINT/COMINT] reports of telephone and other communications intercepts of every relevant communication in the world.
|Millions of News Stories|
That's a lot of material to edit into a morning brief lasting roughly an hour, complete with visuals.
|Jim Clapper: DNI|
Now, all those millions of pages of data are compressed into the President's Daily Brief [PDB], accompanied by the paper copy called the NID [National Intelligence Daily], formerly produced by the Director of Central Intelligence, but now under the thumb of the Director of National Intelligence [James Clapper].
This is all contained in a binder of about 30 pages, each with three to five paragraphs - plus images.
|President's Daily Brief|
The "C" also stands for "Compartmented" which means that only a limited number of persons are authorized to have access to the material -- so not all the Cabinet Officers are privy to the contents; usually, just the President, the SecState, the SecDef, and the National Security Advisor. On occasion, portions of PDB are EYES ONLY for the President.
Intelligence Community staffs screen all this information, compile it, edit it, and feed it into a central intelligence staff which refines it into the material suitable for PDB and reduced in hard copy form to the NID. Separately, key items are highlighted for the oral brief which takes critical information essential to the President and the Cabinet for their decision-making process on issues of strategic importance.
So, the PDB oral version consists of a senior intelligence officer presenting the brief at a podium where he/she can control the visuals during the brief, to include highlights in Power Point, along with key imagery blown up to wall-sized pictures, with subsequent blow-ups to show minute detail.
|Multi-media briefing -- Better than the book|
Thus, the value of the PDB is to educate the President on every major event in the world which may impact the US or its allies. Because it is delivered orally, it affords the President the opportunity to grasp the importance of an event, and to receive input from his advisors, so that, should a strategic decision be necessary, he will have the background from which to decide, or at the very least, know how to ask an intelligent question to obtain the information he needs. the NID
Browsing, or even perusing the NID, will not provide the President the knowledge he needs as the Commander-in-Chief, particularly if he is more interested in the next campaign speech he will give.
The failure of a President to employ the most effective tool at his disposal
to conduct the affairs of State is inexcusable.