Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Intel Agencies Break Law




This is another of our Guest Commentaries.
This is particularly of note due to the assault on Mike Flynn, who has done 
nothing amiss other than to fail to discuss is actions with the Vice President.  
His discussions with the Russian Ambassador were completely 
within the purview of the National Security Advisor, 
and well within the bounds of his predecessors, 
e.g., Henry Kissinger and Vernon Walters.

However, since we have worked closely with the NSA and the Department of Justice
 in earlier years, we note that the actions of senior officials 
in the Intelligence Community have not only acted in a 
partisan political manner, they have broke the law.  

We publish this account to remind Mr Trump to eliminate 
the top third of the National Intelligence Directorate 
-- including Clapper and Brennan, 
and withdraw their clearances 
and access to the agencies.

We remind our readers of the reasons 
Trump Dissed the Intel Community.

------------------------------------------------

Political Appointees in Intel Agencies Repeatedly 
Broke the Law To Take Out General Flynn


Captain Joseph R. John
15 FEB, 2017
Op Ed # 336

Nine appointees in the Obama administration, from one or more intelligence agencies, possibly NSA, CIA, or DNI, were involved in leaking sensitive information to the press, that resulted in General Mike Flynn’s resignation as the National Security Advisor.  The nine individuals were political activists opposed to President Trump; they released transcripts of recorded phone conversations to the press of General Flynn conversations with the Russian Ambassador to the US (by law, the name of any US Citizen in such a classified transcript must be redacted, hiding their identity from the press). 

General Flynn did not violate any laws in his conversations with the Russian Ambassador, and there was no collusion during the election.  Unfortunately, General Flynn failed to provide President Trump with complete information about the conversations he had with the Russian Ambassador, and misled Vice President Pence, resulting in the need for his departure.

Because of the degree of sensitivity of the information, only senior personnel in the intelligence agencies like John Brennan, and James Clapper would have received the subject information.  

The goal of the nine leakers was to take down the National Security Advisor; they imperiled National Security.  

The Intelligence agencies 
1) Felt threatened by General Flynn's criticism of how they operate, 
2) Opposed his plan to reveal the anti-US provisions of Obama’s flawed
    Iranian Nuclear Weapons Agreement, and 
3) Targeted him long before President Trump was elected.   

The FBI will investigate who released the classified transcripts to the press; those individuals should be charged with perpetrating a federal crime. The leaks over time created a nonstop press frenzy, and contributed in large measure toward the resignation of General Flynn.  The interference in domestic politics by intelligence agencies is a major threat to the democracy of the Republic, and a federal crime.   
[Notably, this is the first time in US history that ANY Intelligence official has taken an operational political role (other than Brennan or Clapper -- both of whom have perjured themselves before Congress) ]. 


Their success in removing General Flynn as National Security 
Advisor won't be the end of attacks on President Trump’s staff;
 there have been reports by Democratic Congressmen that 
the next target will be Kellyanne Conway, 





and they will probably go after Steve Bannon.


 
-- the ultimate target will be President Trump

There has been a very dangerous conspiracy underway in the Republic since the election of Donald Trump, the conspiracy has gained steam in the 3 ½  weeks since President Trump was inaugurated.  The conspiracy is being promoted by Obama’s new organization for progressives, the “Organization for Action”; there are 14 National Field Directors organizing volunteers in 50 states. 

The Chicago -based "Organization for Action" (OFA); is being funded by George Soros and is supported by Bill Ayers.  You can learn a great deal about OFA by going to its Web site; and by searching other links on the Internet that discuss OFA’s goals.   
[Ringleaders include Obama Campaign Manager Jim Messina, Michelle Obama, and, of course, David Axelrod].

Obama is the first occupant of the Oval Office to ever mobilize millions of Americans to demonstrate in the streets against his successor on his successor's inauguration day.  


Obama is also the first occupant of the Oval Office to organize street demonstrations, across the nation, against his successor on every weekend since the new President was inaugurated.  


OFA opposes gun rights, supports the immigration of Muslim refugees, supports the entry of illegal aliens, opposes the wall on the Southern Border, supports LGBT initiatives, supports the UN Climate Change initiatives, supports retention of Obamacare, has instituted a massive Alinsky methods training program for volunteers in all 50 states, is promoting Congressional Town Halls demonstrations to shout down Congressmen, is supporting street demonstrations across the nation, etc.  

Soros has funded and trained 32,000 Alinsky-trained radical anarchists to support OFA demonstrations against each new Trump initiative; the goal is to make President Trump’s term in office ungovernable by any and all means.  Soros is funding and supporting the radical left to form over 1000 groups operating in all 50 states, who will stop at nothing to take down and/or derail the Trump administration.

Obama’s Organization for Action, along with the left of center liberal media establishment, will be opposing President Trump for the next four years with the support of many radical organizations.   OFA demonstrators will be joined by organizations funded by George Soros like the Muslim Brotherhood, La Raza, Black Lives Matter, the Communist Party USA, the Nation of Islam, George Soros’s “Open Society Foundation”, Al Sharpton’s “National Action Network”, Moveon.org, the Tides Foundation, Amnesty International, American Federation of Teachers, the Weatherman Underground, the New Black Panther Party, CodePink, SEIU, etc., who have been supporting the massive demonstrations across the nation opposing every one of President Trump initiatives.  

The violent opposition, shutting down free speech, is being promoted by Obama, William Ayers [Obama's business partner in Chicago], and Soros. 

The Trump administration has political opponents on both sides of the aisle who don't want President Trump to upset the way things have always been done in Washington.  Although the Republicans control both houses of Congress, it appears that the Republican leadership will support Congressional investigations into the Trump administration staff Kellyanne Conway and General Mike Flynn.

The Democrats never approved an investigation of Obama’s staff when the Obama administration had control of Congress.  Scandals like  “Fast and Furious” that required investigation were opposed, and Democrats opposed the investigation into “The Battle of Benghazi”.  

Unlike the Republicans, the Democrats circled their wagons to protect Obama.  It appears that Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell will not protect President Trump in the same way from an unfair congressional investigations being threatened by Congressional Democrats.   

Although General Flynn resigned, the new National Security Advisor, will be either Vice Admiral Robert Harward, USNA ’79, USN (Ret) (SEAL) or General David Petraeus, USMA ’74, USA (Ret); either Flag Officer will be a strong National Security Advisor.

Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John.  All Rights Reserved.  The material can only posted on another Web site 
or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author.  
It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.   

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62
Capt    USN(Ret)/Former FBI
Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC



Sunday, January 22, 2017

ObamaCare Reformed



This is another in a series of posts authored by those 
capable of intelligent analysis of complex and 
controversial subjects.  We share on the 
basis of educating our audience whom 
we trust will pass along this
analysis to others.




[via: J Duncan Barry]


"Liberals are notorious for caring about 'groups' of people, but when it gets down to individual persons, not so much. You’re about to see this play out in spades as Democrats cry crocodile tears over the coming repeal of Obamacare.

"You hear it over and over again: 
'This will be catastrophic for the 20 million people who were previously 
uninsured but now have coverage! You can’t take away their health care!'

"First of all, no one is talking about doing that. Any repeal legislation will have a transition period for those who got coverage through Obamacare to move to new plans. 
And second, they will have more choices and better options. Win. Win.

"But liberals would rather focus on quantity, how many millions we’ve given something to, versus quality, what does that 'gift mean for individual people.

"The Obama administration claims 20 million more Americans today have health care due to Obamacare. The reality is that when you look at the actual net gains over the past two years since the program was fully implemented, the number is 14 million, and of that, 11.8 million (84 percent) were people given the 'gift' of Medicaid.

"And new research shows that even fewer people will be left without insurance after the repeal of Obamacare. Numbers are still being crunched, but between statistics released by the Congressional Budget Office and one of the infamous architects of Obamacare, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Jonathan Gruber, it’s estimated that anywhere from 2 to 7 million people now on Medicaid would have qualified for the program even without Obamacare.

"That further discredits the [Obama] administration’s claim of 20 million more Americans having health insurance because of Obamacare.

"Multiple studies have also shown that even those who are uninsured often have better outcomes than those with Medicaid. A University of Virginia study found that for eight different surgical procedures, Medicaid patients were more likely to die than privately insured or uninsured patients. They were also more likely to suffer complications.

"And it is important to note that this study focused on procedures done from 2003-2007, prior to the geniuses in Washington deciding it was a good idea to put even more people on the already overburdened Medicaid system.

Try to control your bleeding while we take care of Jose's sniffles

"Additionally, despite what proponents of the law promised, there is little evidence to show that the use of emergency rooms, which have a higher level of medical errors, has decreased due to Obamacare.





"Then there is this reality: While Obamacare has handed out millions of new Medicaid cards, that does not mean the recipients now have quality health care. In fact, it doesn’t ensure they have health care at all. That’s because increasing numbers of doctors aren’t accepting Medicaid.

Useless if doctors won't accept it

"As a Louisiana woman told The New York Times
'My Medicaid card is useless for me right now. It’s a useless piece of plastic. 

I can’t find an orthopedic surgeon or a pain management doctor who will accept Medicaid.'




"Keep that in mind every time liberal Democratic senators pull out the Kleenex boxes bemoaning the fact Republicans are the ones trying to take people’s health care away."

We thank Mr Barry for his insightful analysis of the ObamaCare conundrum which continues to reign as the most catastrophic of the Obama legacy.

Monday, January 9, 2017

Democrats Hit Bottom




In our effort to promote discussion and disseminate words of wisdom, 
we periodically republish commentary from a variety of sources.  

This commentary is from Chris Parks, who exploded on FaceBook 
regarding the Democrats and Hillary.  We've kept our edits to a 
minimum, to include leaving in the vernacular expletives.


Democrats? knock knock knock: DEMOCRATS?

Listen up!

John Podesta is one your top people in the Democrat party. He is way up there at the top. Whatever he is, he is supposed to be one of your crackerjack best. Right? Must be a fucking GENIUS, I tell ya.


And he has an email account that was hacked and revealed to the public, the email that only the elite of the Democrat party was ever going to see, generated from the Democrat controlled email server that handled DNC email..............that one.

All of that technology and super duper, wiz bang, expensive IT.

And what does Podesta do with it?

First, his Password is............ <TADA> "Password!"

Next, he opened questionable email. You know, the kind with boogers in it? 
That kind. 
The kind that uses your computer to communicate somehow with the hacker's computer.

When you visit your old aunt, grandma, or even mom, you automatically get on their PC, and start removing viruses and trojans....... for exactly the same reasons: stupid password and opening infected email.

Podesta probably wasn't alone with moronic email administration, but the fact that he was at the top makes this even MORE damning on many levels. Podesta is a moron and an ass. He treated all of this with a cavalier attitude. And THIS is what you call a leader?

I am more than sure that State Department IT accounts for top level people handling electronic devices in the course of doing their job. This Podesta revelation means that the top Dems have below zero familiarity with electronic data transmission even on a consumer level. Read that again. Now remember Hillary nailed under similar circumstances for email and device usage. The fish rots from the head down.

It is now crystal clear that when you add Obama, plus Hillary, plus Kerry, plus Lynch, plus Podesta, plus the DNC, plus the Clinton Foundation, and on and on and on............
they are totally incompetent in administration, financing and cyber security. 
And that they are incompetent to the point of deluding themselves that they are doing things the right way. 
We constantly see them as ridiculously incompetent.

Except this is OUR USA too. And we don't want it to get all fucked up. 
And we don't give a shit about your fucking feelings, we give a shit about ours. 
Here's OUR fucking feelings. 

The Democrat Party, in its entirety, including the rank and file, is totally and irretrievably incompetent and corrupt. 
In addition to the total and complete failure of the Obama Administration, where you weren't convinced that he was incompetent in his first term, you re-elected him to prove it again, 

-- and then you run a damned CRIMINAL for President! 

1) Benghazi - watching via drone video as US Ambassador and three other Americans are assaulted and murdered, while denying nearby US Military units authorization to intercede and rescue them; and then to lie about it!


2) Covert movement of Libyan weapons to Al Qaeda in Syria

3) Clinton Foundation Money Laundering [$320 Million]

4) Pay to Play - Sale of 20% of US Uranium to Russian company -- for Foundation contribution 

4) DNC Convention manipulation -- causing the DNC Chair to resign!





Seth Rich turned over Podesta Emails to Wikileaks










It's like you used a fully loaded automatic weapon, shot yourself in both feet, 
and then RE-LOADED and shot 'em again!
WTF!

But NOT "WTF" for you! 

Oh no! 
Tradition of Never Accepting Responsibility
It's the fucking RUSSIANS! 
What are you doing? 

A remake of the 1960's Alan Arkin movie The Russians Are Coming!??

It's over for you. 
You have thoroughly urinated all over yourselves several times and you stink from it. 
Video of you people is now the joke of the day.

In Alcoholics Anonymous, they say that in order to begin your recovery you need to hit bottom, first.


Democrats? You've hit bottom!




Post Script on 
#Russian Hacking:


John McAfee: 
"I'm going to be very frank with you and the American public. I think that today the most deceptive propaganda to date was perpetrated on American public."
After ripping the CIA's fake 'evidence' to shreds, McAfee summed it up like this:

McAfee: 
"It's not just flimsy. It's either this: 
1) it's propaganda, intended to incite the American people to anger toward Russia for some reason. 
OR, 
2) our intelligence community is so ignorant and naive, that they should all be replaced."